The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you very much, convener. Thanks, too, for the build-up earlier.
I want a couple of points to be clarified before I get into the main thrust of my line of questioning. At a meeting of the NZET Committee in early January, Jim Anderson spoke about a lessons learned document that was to be published by the end of January. This morning, there was some dialogue about documents. Is that the same document, or are they separate? Clearly, the lessons learned from the MV Glen Sannox and the MV Glen Rosa projects are hugely important.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
If possible, yes.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
Yes. That is helpful.
My second question goes back to the points about Mr Tydeman. At the same meeting of the NZET Committee, at column 37 in the Official Report, Kevin Hobbs was asked questions regarding the agreement to second Andy Crossan to Ferguson’s. Mr Hobbs referenced you, Mr Dishon, and said that you questioned him. We have information in the section 22 report, from paragraph 29 onwards, as well as the information from Mr Tydeman, which was touched on earlier, in which he says that the arrangement was
“approved by the chairman ... at the time.”
I accept that that was not you, Mr Miller.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
According to the information that Mr Tydeman sent, the revised contract up to £54k was in June 2022.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
Okay.
Clarity is lacking regarding the five-week holiday period, which has been touched on, so I have some questions about that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
I was going to finish on this point, if I may.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is no problem. There was such a dearth of apprenticeships over many years, so there is a gap, as we all know, in relation to young people coming into the business. The point about keeping people in the business and about work is absolutely crucial.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
With regard to the board, in your time as chair, has meeting every two months been enough?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
The Ferguson’s business plan refers to a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme. I wanted a direct award, and I think that we all wanted that but, obviously, the Scottish Government did not do that, because of legal advice on the legislation that is in place—the UK Subsidy Control Act 2022. Was it wise for the business plan to refer to a direct award for the yard to do the work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Stuart McMillan
With regard to the condition of the yard, I have been in it many times over the years, and I think that it is fair to say that it was a working museum. The condition that it was in due to the complete lack of investment for many years made it a relic of a bygone age, to be quite frank. Notwithstanding the investment that has gone in and which has been touched on today, including the £14.2 million in next year’s budget and the £9 million being put aside from that, it is fair to say that additional and on-going investment will be required to bring the yard to a place where it can compete globally to win work. Would that be something that you would consider?