The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2016 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Do members have any other questions for the panel? As they do not, I thank the witnesses for their helpful evidence this morning. The committee may follow up by letter with additional questions stemming from what has been discussed in the evidence session, and there are a couple of points that the witnesses will come back to us on. That should not be about redrafting a whole section, but any potential hints would be useful.
Would the witnesses like to highlight anything that has not been covered or to add anything to the record?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
I note again that Mercedes Villalba joins us online—she will join us shortly—and that we have received apologies from Oliver Mundell.
I remind the panellists not to worry about turning on microphones during the evidence session as those are controlled by broadcasting. If you would like to come in on a question, please raise your hand or indicate to the clerks. There is no need to answer every question—simply indicate when a question is not for you to respond to. However, please feel free to follow up in writing on any question after the meeting, if you wish.
I will open the questioning. On 2 May, the Scottish Law Commission said to the committee that it is very important that trust law reforms ultimately apply to pension trusts as well. The current plan is for that to have effect through a section 104 order that is agreed by the Scottish and United Kingdom Governments. Do you share the view that the bill should apply to pension trusts in whole or in part? What would the practical impact be for you if there was a gap between the legislation coming into force for most trusts and it then coming into force for pension trusts?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Fair enough. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
It might be worth while to consider the matter. If you were to think of anything after the meeting, you could always send it in.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
No—I am certainly not suggesting that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
We move to section 19, on nominees. As I indicated to the previous panel, the law firm CMS is concerned that section 19, on nominees, as drafted, may not go far enough. Specifically, the firm said that “doubt” would remain as to whether trustees can use, first, nominee custody structures and, secondly, sub-custodians. What are the panel members’ views on both those aspects, which currently fall under the scope of section 19, and on the risks that CMS has identified?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Would anyone else like to come in?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
We move to part 2 of the bill. The committee has heard suggestions of three policy proposals that could be added to part 2. First, last week, Professor Roderick Paisley suggested creating exceptions to legal rights as they currently apply to protect from disinheritance. Secondly, the Faculty of Advocates and Yvonne Evans suggested amending the current strict six-month time limit that applies to a cohabitant’s power to apply to the court for a share of the deceased’s estate. Thirdly, Professors Roderick Paisley and George Gretton suggested clarifying that the law does not permit an unlawful killer to be an executor of their victim’s estate. What are your views on those three proposals? Should they be added to part 2? Should any other changes be made to part 2?
10:15Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
No.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Do you have any views on the other two suggestions?