The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
The instrument sets out charges that are payable for services relating to the recognition of overseas qualifications. Under section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform Scotland Act 2010, instruments that are subject to the negative procedure must be laid at least 28 days before they come into force, not counting recess periods of more than four days. The instrument breaches that requirement as it was laid on 13 March 2025 and came into force on the 28 March 2025.
As required under the act, the Scottish Government has set out the reasons for the breach in a letter to the Presiding Officer, which will be published in the committee’s report on subordinate legislation that is considered at today’s meeting. It explains that the instrument requires to come into force by 28 March to provide a statutory basis for Scottish customers to be charged on the start date of a new contract.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament under reporting ground (j), for failure to comply with laying requirements?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, which is published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee asked about the timing of a planned section 93 order to be made under the Scotland Act 1998, in the context of the wider legal issues that sit behind the making of the instrument.
The Scottish Government stated that arrangements are in place for the section 93 order to be made shortly and that it is due to be considered at the Privy Council in May 2025. It is of the view that the present instrument provides the necessary legal basis for the charging of the fees in Scotland and that the retrospective validation of fees that is proposed in the United Kingdom Government’s Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill will need to attach only to fees that were charged for services that were provided in Scotland before the present instrument came into force.
Does the committee wish to highlight to the lead committee the unusual history and context of the instrument, including the correspondence regarding the proposed section 93 order?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
The Scottish Government has laid an amending instrument that the committee is also considering today, the Disclosure (Scotland) Act 2020 (Commencement No 5, Saving and Transitional Provision) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2025. It inserts a coming into force date of 1 April 2025 for new regulations 13 to 15, which rectifies the error. Does the committee wish to welcome the fact that the Scottish Government has laid a corrective instrument, which will resolve the issue before the principal regulations come into force?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you for that assurance, minister. You were sitting at the table this morning when we went through the other instruments and I am sure that you anticipated that there would be a question about them too. Notwithstanding the scrutiny that we have just undertaken on them, we are reporting another couple this morning. You are right that doing so is part of the scrutiny process that this committee undertakes, either when instruments are withdrawn to be relaid or when the issues with them are caught just before they are laid.
I am sure that I speak for colleagues when I say that we would be keen to understand what more the Scottish Government can undertake to do internally around the drafting of instruments so that there will be fewer such instances. That is not to say that there are many—there are not—but the fact is that another two instruments have been highlighted this morning. Can you indicate to the committee what additional measures you think the Government could look at to improve the output?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Also under this agenda item, no points have been raised on the following instruments.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under item 2, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you for that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
No points have been raised with regard to the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 4, we are considering 4 instruments.