Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 825 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 April 2024

Bill Kidd

Thank you.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 April 2024

Bill Kidd

The Government will look at what you have said when it is formulating its approach but do you think that it might approach you to get further clarification on what you are looking for? There seems to be at least a bit of a differentiation there, shall we say.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 April 2024

Bill Kidd

Right. That is fair enough. It is just that, because there is such an element of divergence there, I was not 100 per cent sure. Maybe it is not as wide as has been presented, but there will be discussion about it.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 April 2024

Bill Kidd

That is useful. Thank you very much for that.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 April 2024

Bill Kidd

I thank the witnesses for their responses, which have been very helpful.

Section 5 of the bill would abolish the requirement to find caution, save in exceptional circumstances. One policy justification for that is that, when a professional is appointed as a judicial factor, they will have professional indemnity insurance. However, in response to your discussion paper in 2010, the Accountant of Court said that she thought that the scope of accountants’ professional indemnity insurance might not be as broad as is generally thought, and that it might not cover embezzlement by accountants. If you remember that—I know that that is going back a bit—did the commission resolve that concern when it was raised when developing its policy on section 5?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 April 2024

Bill Kidd

That would be useful; we could perhaps delve a bit deeper into that.

Staying on caution, in response to the committee’s call for views, the University of Aberdeen and R3 said that they thought that the threshold for requiring caution in section 5 is now too high. Do you have any comments on that? For example, does the phrase “exceptional circumstances” fit with the general policy desire to make judicial factors a solution for the families with missing relatives? Do you see the link there?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 16 April 2024

Bill Kidd

My question is about the Accountant of Court, a role that you have talked about quite a wee bit this morning. There seems to be a differentiation between the SLC’s draft bill and the current draft bill that is not so much about the role but about who and how qualified that person is. In relation to sections 35 and 36 of the bill, the Law Society of Scotland commented on what it regards as a significant departure from the commission’s draft bill and a watering down of the level of legal and accountancy knowledge that is required for the accountant and the deputy accountant roles. The SLC’s draft bill said that they were to be

“knowledgeable in matters of law and accounting”.

However, in the current draft bill, they must be, in the opinion of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service,

“appropriately qualified or experienced in law and accounting”.

The policy memorandum to the bill also makes it clear that formal qualifications are not necessarily required.

What does the commission think about that approach to sections 35 and 36? Do you share the Law Society of Scotland’s concerns about that differentiation?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Additional Support for Learning Inquiry

Meeting date: 20 March 2024

Bill Kidd

I have a wee follow-up question, but it might prove to be a touch tricky. What are your and the Government’s views on the flexible or hybrid learning model, which could see either pupils or their parents—or both working together—choose whether the pupil learns from home or in school? From what you said, it sounds as if your wish is that more people attend school more often, in order to socialise them better, if nothing else.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Additional Support for Learning Inquiry

Meeting date: 20 March 2024

Bill Kidd

As you say, the Scottish Government supports local authorities by providing them with funding to design, develop and build schools, but decisions are made by the local authorities. Does that mean that there is no overarching approach to changing school design when that might not be beneficial to all children?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Additional Support for Learning Inquiry

Meeting date: 20 March 2024

Bill Kidd

In joint evidence that was given to us by Enquire and My Rights, My Say, they said that they continue

“to hear about many of the long-term negative impacts”

of the pandemic. Has there been enough focus on and investment in supporting children, particularly those with anxiety, to re-engage with learning following the pandemic and the isolation that took place due to that?