Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 31 March 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 821 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Scottish Attainment Challenge: Post-inquiry Scrutiny

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Bill Kidd

Now that the nice side of things has been hijacked by Mr Brown, I will take you to another side of the refreshed approach to the Scottish attainment challenge. You have told us about the successes, but what has not worked as well as you had hoped and expected?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Scottish Attainment Challenge: Post-inquiry Scrutiny

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Bill Kidd

We can take it on that basis.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Scottish Attainment Challenge: Post-inquiry Scrutiny

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Bill Kidd

I highlight something that matters to everyone and which was mentioned earlier. To what degree is SAC creating greater equality of outcomes across all income groups? How are people in poorer areas and poorer families being moved up, and is that working well? The cabinet secretary mentioned that there are areas that still need to be worked on—for example, because the Covid pandemic has held things back a bit. To what degree are lower-income areas and individuals being moved up to an equal level?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Bill Kidd

I thank everyone for the huge range of helpful replies. I have a question that was asked previously of John McKendrick. What is the likelihood of the 2026 interim targets and the 2030 aims being delivered? Does anyone have an idea about that? It does not have to be positive, but it would be nice if it was.

12:00  

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Bill Kidd

Rebecca, I know that you have some background knowledge on people who are disabled or have issues other than poverty—although poverty might also be part of the issue. Are the targets possible?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Bill Kidd

That is very positive. Thanks very much.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Bill Kidd

Broadly speaking, people are still being positive in their approach to aim for the targets anyway. By the sounds of it, everybody is working together, which is excellent. We have to remember that sometimes things have to be widened out, which is good.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Bill Kidd

I beg your pardon. I mean how different sectors work together to share evidence of successful access initiatives.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Bill Kidd

Thanks very much for everything that you have given us so far, Professor McKendrick.

Do we lack an active framework for fair access? How much impact has that lack had on the progress towards bringing everyone up to the same level?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Bill Kidd

I have a specific question about a wee disagreement that there seems to be between SATH and the SQA. Maybe this has changed, but it is about interpretation. Members of SATH argued that the question in paper 2 on Scots’ reaction to immigrants was unfair as it had been removed from the course specification, but the SQA review said that all the questions that were asked across both question papers were valid and based on the course specification. Those are two totally divergent viewpoints. Is there any chance of a wee explanation about how you see that, please?