The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 558 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Do you take the point, though, that having those events in the other order—making the announcement first and then being willing to come to answer questions about the real, serious impact of the decision—might have built a little more trust?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
You are going to get one next year though, aren’t you?
10:15Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
There is the world cup, which you know will be busy.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
It is one that is worth taking some time over, I think.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
You have directly anticipated my final question, which is about the process from here on. A four-week consultation would mean that a decision would be made before there was the opportunity not just to hear views from the workforce, viewers and the wider community but for political scrutiny here and at Westminster, where the Scottish Affairs Committee is taking an interest in the matter, too. What can be done to ensure that Ofcom slows down and gives the time that is required for proper scrutiny and for the long-term implications to sink in for viewers in the regions immediately affected and for viewers throughout the UK, given how profound the change could be?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
I want to go back a little, to just before the announcement. You acknowledged that there are challenging long-term trends for the industry, yet you did not include the changes that we are discussing today in your long-term plans, either when the licence was renewed or when the five-year strategic plan was produced. The changes are a short-term response to something that has just happened; they are not part of your longer-term planning.
In the short period since producing your five-year plan, which was five months ago, you have reached a decision that a crisis has emerged and that you need to make serious and damaging changes, which I am sure you would prefer not to have to make. What dialogue and discussion happened with your workforce about what the options might be? At what level did you sit down with your colleagues and say, “We’re in a difficult situation here. Let’s explore the options together,” rather than simply landing this on them?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Can I just remind you of the question?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
My final question is about what happens next. From my understanding, you are trying to push Ofcom into making a decision fairly quickly and you are having a very short consultation window. I suggest that that is wrong, not only from our point of view as politicians who want to scrutinise the decision, or from your workers’ point of view, who will be affected by it, or from viewers’ points of view, but from the wider industry’s point of view. It would be wrong to make this decision quickly because, if Ofcom were to approve it, that would make it very difficult for it to resist other similar changes to reduce or even abolish regionality in other channel 3 regions.
You are proposing a pretty profound change that could impact on independent broadcasting throughout the entire industry. Do we not need to take our time and put pressure on Ofcom to take its time?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
I have seen comments in the industry press where people are eyeing this issue closely and thinking about the consequences for other channel 3 regions. There are serious consequences for the wider network of channel 3 broadcast, not just the immediate regions that will be affected and fear the loss of regionality. There is a real danger that the issue could spread.