The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 694 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
That leaves me turning to you, Mr MacDonald-Russell.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
Very briefly, convener.
I do not want to be at all personally unpleasant about this, but I think that you are saying that we should be more comfortable if the industry representative at this meeting were to be less comfortable with such a degree of regulation.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
In those round-table events, you would have heard people arguing that temporary price reductions, meal deals, freestanding displays and other aspects should be included in the regulations. However, you decided not to do so. Why is that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
You have already mentioned to members on a couple of occasions that you have concerns about the narrow scope of the regulations and the aspects that were not included. My final question is why you think that they are narrow in scope. What is the Government’s rationale? Is it simply taking the path of least resistance, or do you think that there is some other reason why it has decided that this approach is the right one?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
I will come back to Ewan MacDonald-Russell—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
If I read between the lines, it sounds as though you are saying that we cannot know whether the rules are actually being broken, rather than seeing voluntary compliance to a level where fines are not necessary.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
I think that I have got two minutes left, if I am timing correctly.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
The definition would take a bit longer. Does that mean that you will do that work? Is that a commitment for the next parliamentary session? Is the Government’s position that you will do this first and that more will come?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
I come to enforcement. Ideally, enforcement would not be necessary and you would get complete compliance, but the experience from England suggests that that is not happening. Local authorities already have a significant burden of responsibility and do not feel resourced enough in relation to existing issues such as food crime, environmental health and so on. Would you accept the principle that, if an industry requires to be regulated, it should pay for the cost of that regulation? Does local government have the tools to ensure that the activity of regulating generates enough income to pay for itself?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Patrick Harvie
I am keen to understand a little more clearly what Miles Briggs has in mind and how he envisages an independent information service working.
Does he anticipate that it would operate within the NHS, or would the Scottish Government fund it through the voluntary sector? Can he tell us a little more about how he envisages that working, and, in particular, whether he considers that such an independent service could come under pressure because of contested views about what impartial or neutral information consists of?