The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 764 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Does the Scottish Government see any plausible way of locking in the improvement that has happened so that future UK Governments would still be required to work in as collegiate a way as can be achieved?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
It would also require a change to UK legislation to make that happen.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
The cabinet secretary has put some of the points quite fairly. I will finish by asking him to acknowledge that there is a difference between accountability and transparency. We talk about transparency in relation to providing information, but there needs to be something more for there to be accountability. Parliaments—plural—need to be able to ensure that decisions are democratically accountable, even if intergovernmental relationships improve and those improvements rest on good will, and even when things are working well, for example, if it was agreed that the UK Government would rely on common frameworks as the first port of call, rather than using the powers that are contained in the internal market act. Those common frameworks have been agreed between Governments, but they have never been signed off by Parliament. They are not required to be brought to the Parliament for approval, so there is a lack of accountability, even where there is some transparency.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I am grateful for that clarity. I was perhaps expecting a bit more pushback.
We will get into what political parties want out of the election process separately—that is not a matter for this committee. Every political party will want as many seats in the Parliament as it can win. However, I hope that, when the cabinet secretary speaks to another former member of the Smith commission—the First Minister, who I am sure he speaks to regularly—he will reinforce the danger of implying to the people of Scotland and the other political parties that, if a pro-independence majority but not a single-party majority is returned in May, the mandate that is being sought will not have been achieved. We have to avoid the situation where other political parties or the UK Government can claim that that is the case. I hope that the cabinet secretary will encourage the First Minister to be equally explicit that the mandate that is being sought is a pro-independence majority of MSPs in Parliament.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
If someone makes an offer on social media, perhaps even within a friendship group, to provide procedures outwith permitted premises, is there anything in the bill, or under the current law, that will allow enforcement action to be taken?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
If anything further could be provided in writing before the bill progresses, that would be helpful.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Do you expect to explore that approach in relation to non-surgical procedures?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Tobacco is an interesting comparison, because we require information to be provided not simply in text form but through images that are sometimes deliberately shocking.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I just want to follow up on the enforcement theme. The bill would create an offence of providing procedures outwith permitted premises, but it does not include an offence of offering those procedures in those circumstances. Are there any existing offences that would come into play in relation to offering procedures in that way and which could play a role in enforcement? The powers to inspect premises, including powers of entry, come into play where there is a reasonable belief that the offence of carrying out the procedure has been, or is being, committed. Is there another way of allowing enforcement authorities to exercise that power of entry where procedures are being offered, or where the offer to make them available can be demonstrated, but there is no evidence that a procedure has actually happened?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I just want to follow up on the questions about public awareness and perhaps draw out a little more the Government’s attitude to the balance between the public sector’s responsibility to provide public awareness information and providers’ responsibility to provide information.
When we talk about other products on sale that have some health harms, we do not simply say that there is a public health awareness campaign and we do not simply say that providers have to give information—we say both things. I am not quite clear whether the Scottish Government is saying that it wants to regulate the information on risks that providers of such procedures have to make available. I recognise that advertising is reserved, but regulating the provision of information about risks is surely a public health matter and therefore devolved.