The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 654 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
I am asking what level of dialogue you had with your workforce.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I will follow up on the same themes. I have come to the inquiry quite aware of how much I do not know about this topic. I have been trying to read as much as I can from the evidence that has been submitted. However, I do not know whether the severe delay in getting a diagnosis is purely down to capacity, or is the result of people wanting a diagnosis where the criteria are marginal, the judgement is difficult and they have to be seen many times, or whether it is purely down to the variation in practice in different health boards.
We are being told by a great many people that diagnosis is an extremely important part of not just understanding their own experience but addressing it. I do not know whether diagnosis is clinically necessary. We have been told that these are not disorders, diseases or things to be cured in any sense, but normal diversity. Is diagnosis clinically necessary or is it merely that support is not available without it, so it is therefore a necessary hoop to jump through, rather than clinically required? Can you answer those questions? The evidence that we have seen so far leaves me none the wiser.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Forgive me, but I am aware that we are short of time. I do not mean to push back too strongly, but it feels as though you are describing the current state of affairs rather than a path forward. Is there a potential for a change that GPs would accept and would result in there being a consistent approach to dealing with those who have perhaps gone to the voluntary sector, and a clear sense of what standard would require to be met in order to have acceptance by GPs in a more consistent way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Does anyone else want to come in and react to what we have heard on that idea of building on good practice? Is that a reasonable phrase to use when practice is so widely varied? Some health boards simply do not provide adult assessments at all, for example, whereas others do.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Were you looking to come back in, Dr Malone?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Absolutely.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Can I just check a phrase that you used there? Was it “consensus diagnosis”?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
But that would not remove the requirement for a formal diagnosis if medication was being sought.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
I was just going to say that I am conscious that we have an online witness from NHS Highland who may want to reflect on what has been said and on the experience of the NAIT pathfinder programme.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Unless there are any final comments on that, I will leave it there.