The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 782 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Even in that answer, you said, “these things”, but is there a clear definition of which things we are referring to as medical procedures?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I am curious. I was already thinking about this because of the term “medical aesthetics”, which has come up several times. There has been a discussion about the idea that some procedures have been demedicalised, or that the term “medical” is in contention. I have a basic question. What determines whether a procedure is medical? What defines medical aesthetics as opposed to non-medical procedures that people might have for aesthetic reasons? Is it the qualifications of the person who is conducting the procedures, the setting in which they are conducted, how they are regulated or whether they are done for medical reasons—in other words, to treat a medically diagnosed condition?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
There is not an objective definition, then. We are using the term, “medical aesthetics”, but is there a clearly accepted definition of what that refers to and what it does not?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I appreciate that there are different perspectives. From a policy perspective, I am not sure if I am more confused or less confused, but thank you for the answers.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
In an earlier answer, you mentioned the lack of capital funding. A number of the organisations that we have heard from recognise that addressing the climate emergency will be a significant challenge to many culture organisations. That will include a requirement for capital investment in buildings and facilities, either to decarbonise or to address the impacts of climate change. How do you envisage a capital funding stream working within Creative Scotland? How should its top-level strategic goals be defined? Should the body be given guidance from Government? Should it be entirely independent, as the cultural decisions of Creative Scotland are independent from politics? Alternatively, should that be demand led?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I will be very quick. Thank you, convener. My question is about political independence.
The act that created Creative Scotland says:
“The Scottish Ministers may give Creative Scotland directions … as to the exercise of its functions. But the Scottish Ministers may not give directions as far as relating to artistic or cultural judgement.”
I think that political independence in respect of creative and artistic judgment is important. The fact that the phrase “culture war” even exists indicates to us that certain issues are being politicised at the moment in our culture, and I would suggest that most of the attempts at that kind of political interference do not come from the Government. They have been expressed in the Parliament or in the media. Does Creative Scotland need similar protection to the one that it has from political interference on cultural and artistic judgments from the Government? Does it need that protection from the Parliament as well?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
I wonder whether I can follow that up by asking colleagues to explore a certain scenario. At UK level, the main Opposition party in Parliament is seeking to repeal climate legislation, and there is a political party polling very strongly for the next election whose policy is led by outright climate change denial and conspiracy theory. To what extent would the Scottish Government’s international offices still be able to adequately function and deliver the Scottish Government’s policy in that area if a UK Government came in that was pursuing the polar opposite agenda?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I have a few separate topics to raise, if there is time. I will start with the core purpose of Creative Scotland, in particular in relation to fair work. We have heard repeatedly—I am sure that you have as well—about the concern throughout the sector that the creative industries generally have a significant problem with achieving anything close to fair work principles, particularly the parts that are dominated by freelance and insecure working.
The issue is referenced at several points in the report, but did you consider whether there is a need for a more substantive and clearly defined role for Creative Scotland in raising standards in the area? Creative Scotland takes the issue seriously, but some of its ways of working and decisions have actually repeated or entrenched the precarious working conditions that exist throughout the sector. Did you consider whether to make a more substantive recommendation on Creative Scotland’s purpose in relation to fair work?