The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4573 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
I have definitely found that to be an issue.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Notwithstanding the extracurricular discussion that we have managed to introduce, we have a recommendation to close the petition that is before us from Mr Golden, while being mindful that there are issues that will need to be explored before long. Are colleagues content to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Were it not for the stage that the Parliament is at, we would have held the petition open a little longer to see whether some of that progress was made. It is one of the shortest periods for a petition to be recognised and action initiated. We first considered the issue only in November. The Government is taking the issue seriously and is taking it forward; it is certainly something that I had not previously been aware of.
For those reasons, we should close the petition, but, again, the proof of the pudding will be in the eating. Something is supposed to be happening, and either it will or will not happen. If it does not happen, the next Parliament will have the opportunity to take the issue more seriously over a longer period of time.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
PE2170, which was lodged by Paul Blaker on behalf of Accountability Scotland, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to abolish the General Teaching Council for Scotland and replace it with a Government agency.
We last considered the petition on 8 October, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government. The Scottish Government maintains that, as far as the regulatory role of the GTCS is concerned, it believes the council to be effective. It therefore reiterates that it has no plans whatsoever to abolish it, as that would be neither desirable nor proportionate.
With regard to the petitioner’s concerns about the co-ordination between the Government and the GTCS, the Government’s position is that policy officials maintain regular contact with the GTCS as part of their on-going responsibilities, to ensure that any responses are informed and accurate.
Members will remember that the GTCS previously commissioned the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care to undertake an independent review of the performance and efficiency of its fitness-to-teach process. The GTCS has now published an action plan for implementing the PSA’s recommendations. The planned actions range from short to long-term measures. Over the next two years, updated fitness-to-teach rules will be developed, with a view to those being published by spring 2028. The Scottish Government has indicated that, although it will stay in close communication with the GTCS during the implementation of the PSA’s recommendations, ultimately, it is for the organisation to take forward the required improvement work.
The petitioner remains concerned that the Scottish Government’s position does not provide sufficient clarity and reassurance, and that it does not address the wider questions regarding systemic failure.
Do colleagues have any suggestions as to how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Do colleagues have any comments? Are we content to accept Mr Torrance’s recommendation?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Would that be on the basis that it would be updated to reflect the evidence that we have had so far, rather than having a repeating cycle in relation to that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Golden. I thought that you were about to put on a face mask and snorkel.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Although the petition deals with issues of substance for those who are affected by RAAC, unfortunately, for the reasons that Mr Torrance has set out, we are not able to take it any further. It will be interesting to see what progress is made and, in the light of that, whether there are fresh issues that could be pursued in the next session of Parliament.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you for raising my constituency, Mr Russell, because my domestic property borders the River Cart. Although I was not a resident at the time, the river used to regularly flood 50 per cent of the garden, until the Eastwood local authority—it was at that time magnificently led by the Conservatives—introduced flood mitigations, which mean that it has never flooded since then, regardless of the weather.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content to close the petition on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.