The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3204 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
You will have heard the evidence from the previous witnesses, some of whom felt that there needs to be an independent review of the national parks, over and above any review that is being conducted by NatureScot. One of the witnesses referred to Mr Ewing’s contribution when we first considered the petition, when he spoke about people marking their own homework and about the fact that NatureScot is a proponent of what is now being advocated in relation to an additional national park, such that there is not public confidence that there has been an independently generated and proper understanding of the benefits and lessons in creating any future national park. What is your attitude to the petitioner’s calls for such an independent review to be established?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Carson, we are quite tight for time, but I can allow you a question if you can pull your thoughts together concisely.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Does anyone want to come in on that point?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Therefore, it is a presumptive approach. It is presumed that the park will exist and then you can make contributions on that.
Before we move on, I welcome Finlay Carson, who has joined us while we consider the petition. Finlay, it is not normally the case that colleagues can participate in the questioning of witnesses, but should you wish to ask something, I am happy for you to indicate that to me and we will seek to bring you in, if that would be helpful.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We can note that, rather than pursue it. I was already struck by the fierce note of controversy that Mr Mayhew introduced by suggesting that Governments should do what they say that they are going to do.
With that, I thank Mr Lucas and Mr Mayhew for their evidence this morning. It is very much appreciated, and it will help us as we consider and develop the petition.
After all that I have said, we will be hearing from our friends at NatureScot at our next meeting, so I hope that they have been listening carefully to our deliberations today. Following that, we will hear from the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and the Islands. Members, are you content to consider the petition at a future meeting after we have had the opportunity to hear from NatureScot and the cabinet secretary?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
As we are slightly behind time, I will suspend very briefly. I therefore ask those who are departing to do so quietly and that we change the scenery and personnel very quickly so that we can proceed without much delay.
11:47 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open and look forward to hearing from Police Scotland in due course.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Carson just made a point about that in his submission. Yes, it seems like an extraordinarily long time for a delay and for nothing to be forthcoming. Those suggestions seems entirely reasonable. Are colleagues content that we keep the petition open and that we pursue those two suggestions and try to get some definition as to what is happening?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
PE2111, which was lodged by Julie Fraser, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to provide families with financial support for early learning and childcare when their child reaches nine months of age. The SPICe briefing notes:
“Funded ELC is available to all three- and four-year-olds and some two- and five-year-olds. Eligibility for children under three is not currently universal, but is based on parents/carers being in receipt of certain benefits or the child or parent/carer having experience of care.”
It also notes that, in the programme for government in 2023-24, the Government said that the expansion of childcare support would cover children from nine months old when it stated that it would
“Work with Local Government and other partners to develop the local infrastructure and services needed to provide childcare from nine months to the end of primary school in specific communities in six local authority areas.”
The Scottish Government’s response to the petition states that it is
“working on the initial stages of an expanded national offer for more families with two-year-olds, focusing first on those who will benefit most.”
It explains that expansion work is currently focused on “insights and engagement”, including
“piloting new approaches through the Whole Family Wellbeing Fund and learning from the six early adopter communities.”
Do colleagues have any suggestions for action?