The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3204 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I am grateful for that broadcast to the nation, Mr Ewing, and I commend you, as I always do, for delivering it with impeccable grammar from start to finish.
Does that mean that you concur with the suggestion of bringing the cabinet secretary to a future meeting?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning and welcome to the 18th meeting in 2024 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. The first item on our agenda is a decision on taking agenda item 4, which relates to the consideration of evidence that we are about to hear, in private. Are members content to take item 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We do not have a national park in Eastwood, so I do not come to this with any particular axe to grind. I always say that what motivates us here is not any party-political position, but is the petition—our responsibility is to try to articulate and take forward the interests of the petitioner as best we can.
I will kick off. We already have two national parks, so what was it that caused the Government to say, “We will now develop another national park?” What was the motivating factor at that point?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
PE2006, lodged by Ewan Miller, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Property Factors (Scotland) Act 2011 to cover dismissal of property factors or to lay regulations that would achieve the same aim. That could include giving the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland powers to resolve disputes related to the dismissal of property factors.
Our colleague, Sarah Boyack, joins us once again in our consideration of the petition. Good morning, Sarah.
We last considered the petition on 7 February, when we agreed to write to the Minister for Victims and Community Safety to seek an update on work to finalise and publish the voluntary code of practice for land-owning maintenance companies. The response from the minister highlights the mechanisms that are available to home owners to remove property factors, which have led her to the view that legislative change at this time is neither necessary nor proportionate. The minister’s response also notes that work has not progressed on the voluntary code of practice as anticipated, and adds that
“this code would apply only where homeowners pay a land-owning land maintenance company for management of the open spaces that are owned by the land maintenance company.”
Sarah Boyack, do you have anything to say to the committee in light of what has progressed—or not progressed, as it turns out—since we last considered the petition?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
It would also be reasonable to seek an update on discussions with the UK Government on funding for RAAC remediation and management, including whether the Scottish Government has any scope in that. The committee may also wish to ask the minister for further information on its plans to review the Scottish home report.
I feel that the issues that have been raised in the petition merit the committee taking formal evidence, and the information that we are seeking will help to inform the committee. The issue is of significant material concern to the individuals who have been affected by RAAC.
Whether we think that the answers that we receive allow the petition’s aims to be advanced in a meaningful way or whether we think that they will have to be addressed by some other means, we should flag up that this is very much an issue on which we might wish to take evidence from the minister at a future meeting. Are members content with that approach?
Members indicated agreement.
11:00Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Is the committee content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
There are two suggestions from Mr Torrance. If there are no other suggestions from the committee, are we content to agree to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open and make those requests, and further examine the options at a later date.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That brings us to the end of the formal part of today’s meeting.
11:12 Meeting continued in private until 11:25.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open and take forward the evidence gathering as suggested this morning. We will also write to the Minister for Housing to seek responses to the points that have been made by the petitioner, and we will seek information from the UK Government. We will do all that with a view to potentially hearing from the minister in order to explore the issues in, I hope, more detail and to get some answers for the many people who have been affected by this issue.
I see that the petitioners are in the gallery. Unfortunately, it is not competent for us to take contributions from the gallery, but I am delighted to recognise that they have taken the trouble to come along and hear our consideration of the petition this morning. I hope that they are pleased that the petition is staying open and that we will be taking forward the issues that it seeks to explore.