The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4270 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We will seek that information.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
A triumph.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We will write to the petitioner to offer the opportunity that I mentioned and reflect on some of the points that Mr Golden made about the committee not being absolutely certain about what we would be stopping at this stage.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
The petition will remain open and we will write to the various organisations suggested.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, it might be risky to be sequential here; let us get it all in there now.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I thought that you were going to say, “As somebody who uses public toilets”. [Laughter.]
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I think that Mr Torrance’s conclusion, as supported by Mr Ewing, was that it does not look as though the Government will change its view on the statutory matter.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That is the most interesting declaration that I have heard in a very long while. Thank you for that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
The first of the continuing petitions is PE1905, which was lodged by Angela Rosina Cousins on behalf of UK XJW’s Support. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to order a public inquiry into the actions that have taken by religious organisations in response to child sex abuse allegations since 1950.
Since our last consideration of the petition, we have written to the Scottish Government, highlighting the recommendations of the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse in England and Wales. As part of that communication, we again called for the Scottish inquiry to have its terms of reference extended or for the Scottish Government to investigate the possibility of establishing an alternative inquiry in order to match the scope of the inquiries that are taking place elsewhere.
We have since received a response from the then Deputy First Minister, John Swinney, restating the Scottish Government’s position that widening the inquiry’s remit is not practicable, as it would make the inquiry “unmanageable in scope”. The response states that it is imperative that resources are dedicated to on-going work to implement the national guidance for child protection.
Do colleagues have any comments or thoughts in the light of the former Deputy First Minister’s latest response?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 6 September 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Colleagues, are we content to support those suggestions?
Members indicated agreement.