The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning and welcome to the 15th meeting in 2022 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. We have received apologies from the deputy convener, David Torrance, who unfortunately cannot be with us this morning. However, we are joined by his substitute, Marie McNair. I am delighted to welcome her to our proceedings. Good morning, Marie, and welcome to the committee. We are also joined online by our colleague Paul Sweeney, who is participating remotely this morning.
Under agenda item 1, as this is Marie McNair’s first appearance at the committee, I invite her to make any declaration of interests that she wishes to make.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Right. Thank you very much.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I will bring in Alexander Stewart, who will ask about a different aspect of the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I want to follow up on one point with Dr Neal. You referred—as did Nicola Murray in her evidence—to the fact that Scotland stands alone in this regard, and that there is a far higher level of protection in law, or at least an offence that can be pursued in law, elsewhere in the United Kingdom. What impact has that had on the way in which such matters are pursued or on their incidence elsewhere in the UK? Let us establish and agree that such matters sit apart and that there is a separate offence that can, therefore, be pursued in that way. What has been the impact of that legislation in those jurisdictions?
09:30Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
This is a general question, but would you say that that has led to a different kind of sentencing?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Monica. You said that the report is 900 pages long—that is almost as big as the number of days on the waiting list. It occurred to me that Parliament will potentially have dissolved before some people are at the top of that waiting list. It is getting close to 2026 before people will be seen, which is an indication of the scale of the issue.
Before we close, does Karen McKeown want to say anything in conclusion?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. That has been helpful. We have covered quite a lot of ground, and we understand where you would like to see us move in relation to that. Monica, would you like to contribute?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Stewart. Are colleagues content with those actions?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I realise that the petitioner’s experience is not consistent with the representations that we have received from NatureScot, but I do not know that there is much more that we can do. We have received assurances from NatureScot, so I think that Mr Stewart’s proposal seems to be the only one that is open to us. If no other member wishes to comment, are we content to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1916, which was lodged by Councillor Douglas Philand and Councillor Donald Kelly, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to instigate a public inquiry regarding the political and financial management of the A83 Rest and Be Thankful project, which seeks to provide a permanent solution for the route.
When we last considered the petition—which was quite some time ago, on 20 April—we agreed to write to Transport Scotland. We have received a response from the Minister for Transport that indicates that five possible route options are currently being assessed, with Transport Scotland expected to make an announcement on a preferred option for a permanent solution by spring 2023. We have also received a response from the petitioners, who have restated their call for a public inquiry and highlighted their concerns around the costs of finding a permanent solution for the Rest and Be Thankful.
Obviously, there are huge issues attendant upon a public inquiry, not all of which are necessarily going to see us make the progress that we might wish. Do colleagues have any suggestions to make on the petition?