The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3738 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
A strand of thinking that you have articulated that registers with me is that we have no timetable. We are simply told that work was done in 2022 and that it will lead to findings being brought to the Scottish Government for consideration. That does not give us a timeline. It could take any amount of time for that to happen, then the Government could take any amount of time to consider the findings, and it could be any time after that before any consequence is suggested.
I wonder whether we might ask the Scottish Government, or whatever the appropriate body is, for a slightly more accountable timeframe to which it can be held. I do not know that there is much more that we can do after that. I am not sure whether Rhoda Grant’s suggestion is one for the committee or whether it is for more personal intervention. Do colleagues have any thoughts?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
As there are no other suggestions from members, are we content to do as Mr Torrance suggests?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Well, if your glass is usually half empty and mine is usually half full, therein is a full glass that we can hope to achieve.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
As Mr Ewing’s glass is half empty and mine is half full, maybe that will mean a successful outcome. I think that we agree that we want to pursue the issues raised in the petition, and we have detailed the ways in which we will do so. The petitioner will have heard all that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I agree with that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am content with that. In asking the Government to undertake an exploration of the benefits and disadvantages, I might also draw to its attention, or provide it with, the response that we received from the UK Government saying that it would be very happy to engage on the whole matter.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Please do.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
PE1900 was lodged by Kevin John Lawson. The petition, on which, as colleagues will recall, we have previously taken evidence, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to ensure that all detainees in police custody can access their prescribed medication, including methadone, in line with existing relevant operational procedures and guidance. We took evidence from former members of the Drug Deaths Taskforce and, subsequently, the Minister for Drugs Policy. We explored a range of issues in relation to the petition, including the use of dihydrocodeine, access to monitoring data and implementation of the medication-assisted treatment standards.
The committee has received two submissions from the petitioner, Kevin John Lawson, which are included in our papers, and correspondence from NHS Grampian to the Minister for Drugs Policy, which was an area that we explored in our cross-examination.
The correspondence from NHS Grampian confirms that it is currently unable to administer MAT, including methadone, in a police custody setting. That, it states, is due to historical constraints and the absence of a controlled drug licence.
The correspondence states that NHS Grampian has set up two short-life working groups, one of which is specifically tasked with completing the implementation of MAT standards in police custody. NHS Grampian is also looking to have a controlled drug licence in place by the end of February this year.
In the light of the responses received, do colleagues have any comments or suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Colleagues, are we agreed? We also want to contact Highland Council in relation to PE1980, as well as contacting IAM Roadsmart, the Road Haulage Association and VisitScotland to seek their views on the Achnasheen and Gorstan petition. Along with acting on the suggestions that have been made, are we collectively content to keep the petitions open and begin our investigation by pursuing our inquiries with those bodies?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Our expressing an interest in pursuing the matter might ensure that something is pursued.