The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3204 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Do we agree to keep the petition open on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open and move forward on that basis.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That brings us to petition PE2048, which has been lodged by James Anthony Bundy, who I see joins us in the public gallery. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to increase awareness of the symptoms of stroke by reviewing its promotion of the FAST—face, arms, speech, time—stroke awareness campaign and ensuring that awareness campaigns include all symptoms of a potential stroke. My colleague Stephen Kerr joins us for consideration of the petition.
At the previous meeting—I apologise again that I was indisposed and unable to participate—the committee heard evidence from representatives of stroke awareness charities, the Scottish Ambulance Service, NHS 24 and clinician academics who specialise in stroke care. Following that meeting, we have received a new submission from the Stroke Association to provide further detail on the research that Mr John Watson referred to during that discussion.
I remind Mr Bundy that the option to provide written submissions to aid our consideration of the petition is always available, whether that is sharing new views or any additional suggestions that he might hope that the committee would consider.
Unfortunately, as I said earlier, David Torrance is not well and is unable to be with us today, but members have had an opportunity to reflect on the evidence that both panels of witnesses provided. On my reading of the Official Report, that evidence appeared to suggest that improving clinical awareness of less common symptoms of stroke and ensuring timely treatment for people experiencing a stroke might hold the key to delivering better outcomes for patients.
Although there appeared to be consensus that the current situation is not good enough, participants raised concerns that, with regard to public awareness, widening the FAST approach to include balance and eyes could have the counter-productive effect of delaying individuals from presenting for diagnosis and treatment, with initial studies indicating lower levels of recall for BE FAST—balance, eyes, face, arm, speech, time—compared to FAST and a risk that individuals will wait for all symptoms to be present before they seek help.
The committee also heard that Scotland’s stroke services have limited capacity and that our priority should be ensuring that people experiencing a stroke can access timely and appropriate treatment. Witnesses expressed concern that, if everyone who presents with vision or balance issues was sent for a stroke assessment without further generalist diagnostic examination, the risk increases that we would end up delaying access for patients experiencing a stroke.
Before I invite colleagues to comment and reflect, I invite Mr Kerr to contribute to our discussion.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Are we content to act on those proposals?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Kerr. This petition has impressed its importance on the committee and it is one with which we have engaged, hence the journey that led us to hearing from the two panels of witnesses at our last meeting.
Would any colleagues who were present at that meeting like to offer reflections on the evidence that we heard, on Mr Kerr’s contribution and on how we might now proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
When I invited you to do that, I did not realise that it would sound like “University Challenge”. I should now say that that was your starter for 10. [Laughter.] Thank you all very much, and welcome.
If you are content, we will move straight to questions. I invite you to decide, minister, when you would like members of your team to contribute—that will be the easiest way forward.
As a general opening comment, I note that the committee has not fully understood why the Scottish Government thinks that no new legislation is required to deal with the problem that has been raised in the petition, given everything that we have heard from the petitioner about the difficulties of navigating the current arrangements.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. Is it Mr Leeton?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Will the advice that is being worked on be a pamphlet or an online directional guide? How would people know that that advice is available and find a route to access it?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I very much agree because, given that some pools are now under active threat of closure, the baby could go out with the bath water, if that is not the wrong metaphor. We could lose a resource and it will be far harder to do anything about that if it is gone than to maintain and preserve the resource that is currently there.
Do any other members have comments?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We want to be informed about those matters, but I am unsure whether we would take the view that that is a national issue.