The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3204 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Petition PE2019, which was lodged by Alan McLeod, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to prevent all owners of self-catering holiday accommodation from obtaining rates relief under the small business bonus scheme.
We last considered the petition at our meeting on 1 May 2024, when we agreed to write to ask the Scottish Government for a fuller response to the petition, including a clear indication of its views on the action that the petition calls for.
In its response, the Scottish Government states that it is committed to maintaining the small business bonus scheme for 100,000 properties for the duration of the current parliamentary session, and that it has no plans to add “self-catering holiday accommodation” to the list of properties that are ineligible for small business bonus scheme relief at this time.
The Scottish Government also states that it is committed to keeping under review all recently implemented non-domestic rates reforms, such as changes to the thresholds for the small business bonus scheme relief, and to ensuring that the system effectively supports businesses and communities.
In his written submission, the petitioner shares his view that awarding market-distorting rates relief to businesses that secure economic advantage from state-provided infrastructure is unfair to citizens who are being denied critical care and services.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?
10:15Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Ewing. Those are all helpful points to have on the record. However, as you said, the Scottish Government has made it absolutely clear that it has no intention of taking forward the issue in the petition. On that basis, it is proposed that we close the petition, albeit with a statement attached, which we can ensure that the petitioner receives. Are colleagues content that we do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Do any colleagues have further reflections?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I understand that, but the petitioner’s argument is that those who seek to dismiss property factors in the civil courts find that the whole process is not practical. Because of the intimidatory nature of potential legal costs and the unquantifiable nature of what they might be, it effectively flashes the frighteners, if I can put it that way, at residents who might feel that that is what they want to do so they hesitate before doing so. How do you respond to that inherent fear, which they say is a deterrent to acting on that instinct, even when they feel that it is what they have to do?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. Colleagues, do you have any suggestions on how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We know that you might be looking for a new job, Mr Ewing, but I did not realise that it was with the Inverness tourist board.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Our next petition is PE2129, which was lodged by Elizabeth Spencer. It calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to require education authorities to adopt a uniform set of criteria and standard consultation process for assessing community demand for denominational schools.
The Scottish Government’s response to the committee points to the statutory consultation process under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 for significant changes to the school estate. The submission highlights that the legislation ensures
“that local authorities consult widely with communities when making decisions about school provision, including establishing new denominational schools, and that there is transparency and public involvement in that process.”
For those reasons, the Scottish Government is of the view
“that the current framework for decision making around the establishment of denominational schools is sufficient.”
The petitioner’s written submission states:
“Despite the legal framework, local authorities vary greatly in how they interpret and apply”
the legislation. Her submission also calls for a dedicated fund for denominational school proposals and clear national guidance to minimise local biases when proposals are being assessed.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action in the light of the Scottish Government’s response?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Golden. Are colleagues content that we should take those actions?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We have touched on the nub of the issue, which is people’s terror about the unquantifiable cost that they would incur.