Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 13 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3204 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Petition PE2019, which was lodged by Alan McLeod, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to prevent all owners of self-catering holiday accommodation from obtaining rates relief under the small business bonus scheme.

We last considered the petition at our meeting on 1 May 2024, when we agreed to write to ask the Scottish Government for a fuller response to the petition, including a clear indication of its views on the action that the petition calls for.

In its response, the Scottish Government states that it is committed to maintaining the small business bonus scheme for 100,000 properties for the duration of the current parliamentary session, and that it has no plans to add “self-catering holiday accommodation” to the list of properties that are ineligible for small business bonus scheme relief at this time.

The Scottish Government also states that it is committed to keeping under review all recently implemented non-domestic rates reforms, such as changes to the thresholds for the small business bonus scheme relief, and to ensuring that the system effectively supports businesses and communities.

In his written submission, the petitioner shares his view that awarding market-distorting rates relief to businesses that secure economic advantage from state-provided infrastructure is unfair to citizens who are being denied critical care and services.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?

10:15  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you, Mr Ewing. Those are all helpful points to have on the record. However, as you said, the Scottish Government has made it absolutely clear that it has no intention of taking forward the issue in the petition. On that basis, it is proposed that we close the petition, albeit with a statement attached, which we can ensure that the petitioner receives. Are colleagues content that we do so?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Do any colleagues have further reflections?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

I understand that, but the petitioner’s argument is that those who seek to dismiss property factors in the civil courts find that the whole process is not practical. Because of the intimidatory nature of potential legal costs and the unquantifiable nature of what they might be, it effectively flashes the frighteners, if I can put it that way, at residents who might feel that that is what they want to do so they hesitate before doing so. How do you respond to that inherent fear, which they say is a deterrent to acting on that instinct, even when they feel that it is what they have to do?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Are colleagues content?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you. Colleagues, do you have any suggestions on how we might proceed?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

We know that you might be looking for a new job, Mr Ewing, but I did not realise that it was with the Inverness tourist board.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Our next petition is PE2129, which was lodged by Elizabeth Spencer. It calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to require education authorities to adopt a uniform set of criteria and standard consultation process for assessing community demand for denominational schools.

The Scottish Government’s response to the committee points to the statutory consultation process under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 for significant changes to the school estate. The submission highlights that the legislation ensures

“that local authorities consult widely with communities when making decisions about school provision, including establishing new denominational schools, and that there is transparency and public involvement in that process.”

For those reasons, the Scottish Government is of the view

“that the current framework for decision making around the establishment of denominational schools is sufficient.”

The petitioner’s written submission states:

“Despite the legal framework, local authorities vary greatly in how they interpret and apply”

the legislation. Her submission also calls for a dedicated fund for denominational school proposals and clear national guidance to minimise local biases when proposals are being assessed.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action in the light of the Scottish Government’s response?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you, Mr Golden. Are colleagues content that we should take those actions?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Jackson Carlaw

We have touched on the nub of the issue, which is people’s terror about the unquantifiable cost that they would incur.