The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3738 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The final continued petition for consideration today is PE2131, which was lodged by Professor Louise Welsh and Jude Barber on behalf of the Empire Cafe. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to grant the River Clyde, and potentially other rivers in Scotland, the legal right to personhood by adopting the universal declaration on the rights of rivers, by appointing a nature director to act as a guardian of the River Clyde, with the responsibility for upholding its river rights, and by considering whether an alternative mechanism should be established to act for the rights of the river, its inhabitants—human and non-human—and society at large. When we last considered this petition on 5 March, we agreed to write to the Glasgow City Region.
The GCR is not able to provide a view on the action that is called for in the petition, as it falls outside the remit of the Glasgow and Clyde Valley cabinet. The cabinet is specifically responsible for decision making in relation to the city deal, strategic economic development priorities as well as any other activities agreed by the authorities.
We also requested more information from the GCR regarding the work to deliver the Clyde mission, as well as any action that could be undertaken to formalise and improve accountability in the management of the River Clyde. The response reminds us that, in August 2023, the Scottish Government transferred lead responsibility for the Clyde mission to the GCR and Argyll and Bute Council, as well as providing funding. Work on a strategic master plan was due to commence this summer, and the GCR indicates that a strategic outline business case was also going to be produced alongside that to strengthen decision making and underpin long-term investment.
The response states that, for the GCR, governance for the Clyde mission has been incorporated into existing regional structures; for Argyll and Bute, any reporting and approval is co-ordinated by council officers, with support from the GCR if necessary. The GCR highlights that a Clyde mission partnership board would in due course also be established and developed in parallel with the strategic master plan.
Do colleagues have any suggestions on how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We seem to have come to a hybrid position. We are closing the petition but sending the biggest letter of suggestion to the Scottish Government in so doing. We might normally have done that if we were keeping the petition open. Notwithstanding that, we do not expect that there is a lot that we can do in this session, but we want to highlight the issues to the Scottish Government.
I hope that the clerks have been able to discern from that a course of action with which we can proceed. Is that acceptable to members of the committee?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That advice might be generally applied on a number of different occasions. Are there any alternative suggestions to those of Mr Torrance?
Members: No.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Are we content to close the petition on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you for that. Do members agree to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 16th meeting of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee in 2025.
Under agenda item 1, we simply have to decide whether to consider in private item 5, which covers a discussion on the evidence that we will hear this morning. Are colleagues content?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That could be set out in the letter to the petitioner confirming that the petition has been closed, if the committee is minded to close it. Is the committee minded to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
It might be worth pointing out that the Scottish Government published “Consultation: The Future of Council Tax in Scotland” on Monday. The public consultation closes on 30 January 2026, so it would be sensible to suggest to the petitioner that she could contribute to it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
There is a process under way, and it would be open to the petitioner to come back in the next parliamentary session, depending on progress in relation to aspects of the issue that have been raised. However, that is when these matters are most likely to be addressed. Are colleagues minded to support Mr Torrance’s proposal?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We will close the petition but, as I say, we will write and encourage the petitioner to bear in mind the responses that we have received.