The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1012 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
My question is for DS Telford, who has raised some interesting questions.
DS Telford, I realise that you are not here to say what the law should be, but we have discussed whether some of the complications that you have talked about would exist if a limit of two dogs was applied to rough shoots so that there could only be two dogs at a shoot. Whether that proposal is right or wrong, I am interested to know, given that we have discussed it, whether you think that it would be a simpler and more enforceable solution.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
However, you would not be open to vexatious allegations in the hypothetical situation in which you had only two dogs.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
I am the MSP for Na h-Eileanan an Iar.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
The Government has offered some clarification on the proposal to permit two dogs per person on a shoot. I am curious to know what your view is of those clarifications.
In addition, as we have discussed, one of the alternatives to that is to have two dogs per shoot as a whole. Although the witnesses have mentioned this, I would be interested to know what the implications of that would be for a rough shoot. Would it be possible to have a shoot with a limit of two dogs for the shoot as a whole? Would that restrict what you do on wildlife control or would it merely restrict the shoot as a social event?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
I have a brief observation. I understand the points that people are making about retrieving birds but, to be clear, the bill is not about birds—it is about mammals. As interesting and useful as those points are, the bill would not touch on them, as far as I understand.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
Cabinet secretary, I appreciate that we are here to talk primarily about the report but, in your opening remarks, you mentioned that, if Scotland was not carved out of the retained EU law bill, we would need to look at—I think you said—“totally new” approaches for keeping pace with some areas. Has there been any indication whatsoever from the UK Government whether it intends to do any such carving out? If not, what might be other options that the Scottish Government would have to pursue, and what would be the likely scale of the task?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
We have talked and have asked about whether exemptions around rough shooting might be workable. In our additional call for evidence, we received a comment from the Scottish Animal Welfare Commission, which stated:
“In the commission’s view, extending the bill’s provisions further to accommodate other forms of rough shooting is undesirable and unnecessary. To do so would seriously risk undermining both the legislation’s purpose and its enforcement.”
Did the Government consider that further exemptions in respect of rough shooting would undermine other parts of the bill or the principles of the bill?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
No. I mean when the bill was drafted, did the Government consider that attempting to make further allowances around rough shooting would undermine parts of the bill? Was that an issue that you considered?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
My question is about the comments that Police Scotland has made on enforceability. You will be familiar with the issue that we have just discussed around what constitutes a pack, but there are other enforcement issues. Police Scotland said that it feels that most people—I think that those were the words that were used—would obey the law, but will those comments be considered when, for instance, guidance or licensing schemes are being formulated?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Alasdair Allan
On the back of that, can you take us through the issues that were considered in reaching an approach whereby there is a difference in the number of dogs that can be used for rough shooting and the number that can be used for other types of shooting, if that is a correct reading of things? Was the safety of wild mammals the primary issue that you considered when you considered this area of the bill?