The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 994 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Alasdair Allan
I will speak to amendments 25 and 26.
Amendment 25 requires the Crofting Commission to check whether a croft has been let by the commission and is subject to the 10-year restriction on assignation before consenting to a family assignation application. That restriction will ensure that someone does not transfer their croft or sell up early in order to make a profit from a free let by the commission. That control already applies to general assignations, and my amendment would apply it also to fast-track family assignations.
Amendment 26 changes the sequence of the application for a family assignation and would require the crofter to serve a copy of the family assignation application to the landlord at the same time as they submit their application to the commission and to indicate to their landlord that they have 28 days to make any representations directly to the commission. That is a more natural and familiar approach for handling any representations than requiring the applicant to find out the landlord’s views in advance and to then tell the commission what the landlord’s views are. It also means that the commission will be informed that the landlord has been notified at the time when that happens, so that, if the landlord objects, the commission will already be aware of the application to connect the objection to. I encourage members to support my amendments in the group.
I move amendment 25.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Alasdair Allan
I press amendment 25.
Amendment 25 agreed to.
Amendment 176 not moved.
Amendment 26 moved—[Alasdair Allan]—and agreed to.
Section 8, as amended, agreed to.
After section 8
Amendment 177 not moved.
Before section 9
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
Can you say a bit more about the Government’s attitude and approach to getting a voluntary uptake of 45 per cent? In particular, what will that mean for partnership working between the Government and farmers?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
We are living in a world with new pressures in relation to the trade deals that are being struck with other countries in the post-Brexit environment. How alive does the Government have to be to the pressures on the industry when forming such a partnership?
09:45
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
The committee has returned again and again to the issue of offsetting; we have probably spoken to you about it previously. What is the Government doing to ensure that, in the future, we do not continue to meet our appetite for meat in Scotland simply by replacing meat that is produced here with meat that is produced somewhere else, perhaps to poorer animal welfare or environmental standards?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
Finally, I want to highlight an issue that, again, the committee has raised in the past. I do not know whether it was relevant to the considerations that you just mentioned. Is there a danger that, in many parts of the country, agricultural activity could slump to a point at which it would no longer be sustainable at a community level or as part of the local economy? What part did that play in the considerations? Did you consider any alternatives for less favoured areas with regard to things that would have to change in the future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
As everyone knows, some areas of peatland have much higher emissions than others. How are you seeking to identify—or are you seeking to identify—the most degraded or most high-emitting areas of peatland under your policy?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
You indicated that there will have to be an effort by all concerned, not merely by Government. In that case, what is being done to mainstream the activity of peatland restoration in the day-to-day ownership and management of land in Scotland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Alasdair Allan
You are clearly making a virtue of the partnership approach, but is there a backstop if that is not sufficient? Would you consider encompassing other measures if that approach did not work?