The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1694 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Thank you. Councillor Heddle has indicated that he would like to come in before we finish.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Professor Fothergill, you also commented on issues around uncertainty and the introduction of the new scheme. Do you want to comment on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
The main item of business is an evidence session on the Subsidy Control Bill, which is United Kingdom Parliament legislation. The UK Parliament is seeking the consent of the Scottish Parliament, as the bill has an impact on devolved matters and the executive competence of the Scottish ministers. The bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 30 June 2021. Provisions in the bill apply to all of the UK. The bill is continuing its passage through Westminster and I understand that it is scheduled for its second reading in the House of Lords next Wednesday.
The purpose of the bill is to establish a domestic subsidy control regime for the UK following exit from the European Union, and to provide a legal framework for public authorities to make subsidy decisions. The Scottish Government lodged a legislative consent memorandum on 21 October, which has been referred to this committee to consider and report on. The Scottish Government does not recommend to the Scottish Parliament that it give consent to the bill in its current form. The purpose of today’s session is for us to hear views on the provisions of the bill and its impact in Scotland, before taking evidence from the Scottish Government next week.
I welcome our witnesses and thank them for joining us. We have with us Professor David Bell, chair of the steering group for the consultation on the replacement to the European structural and investment funds in Scotland; Professor Steven Fothergill from Sheffield Hallam University; Councillor Steven Heddle, environment and economy spokesperson with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities; and George Peretz QC from Monckton Chambers. As always, I ask members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as concise as possible.
I will start the questions. I thank the witnesses for the written submissions that we have received. The submissions talk about the opportunities in the bill and the need for the bill to be introduced, but say that it seems to create a tension. With the opportunities, there might be inflexibility and the need for authorities to have a degree of certainty. Mr Peretz’s submission says that the changes will give us more flexibility and speed and other advantages but, at the same time, it will be a challenge for authorities, which might be risk averse. There is a degree of uncertainty as to how the system will work compared to the European Union subsidy regime that we had previously.
I ask Mr Peretz to go first and to talk about where he sees some of the opportunities and where the tensions and difficulties lie. How will the subsidy regime operate and what will it mean for those trying to work within it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Thank you. I will move on to Maggie Chapman, who has questions about consultation. I understand that Councillor Heddle would like to come in; I am sure that Ms Chapman will invite you to speak.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Thank you. I will bring in Colin MacDonald. I am sorry—I meant Gordon MacDonald
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Thank you. Mr Beattie, I am afraid that we must make progress. Jamie Halcro Johnston is interested in asking his questions, so we will move on to him.
The witnesses were initially advised that we would conclude by 11. However, three members still wish to come in, so I hope that they are content to remain with us for a bit longer.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
I will now bring in Alexander Burnett, who will be followed by Colin Beattie. I know that it is unfortunate for members to speak later in the meeting, but I ask members to be concise in their questions. That would be helpful.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Finally, do you have a view on the question that Gordon MacDonald asked of Mr Peretz on the asymmetry of power when it comes to making complaints to the CMA? I think that Mr Peretz said that the UK Government would argue that it will take forward issues in the best interests of the UK as a whole. However, the concern is that it would focus on English subsidies and that there will be no equivalent power for Scotland or Wales to make representations if they are unhappy with awards that are made in England. The defence of the UK Government appears to be that it will act in the interests of the UK, so nobody should be concerned. Is that the correct understanding of the situation?
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Thank you. Mr Peretz wishes to come in. Councillor Heddle mentioned the ability to veto. Could you comment on that? I know that you have previously commented on the issue of asymmetric power.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Claire Baker
Thank you. That is helpful.
I would like to thank all the witnesses for providing their time and expertise, which are much appreciated.
11:29 Meeting continued in private until 12:04.