The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 670 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
George Adam
We could debate that issue for quite a while.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
George Adam
I am always a great believer in stealing someone else’s ideas if they are good.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
George Adam
David Thomson, do you have anything to add?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
George Adam
It is funny that you should say that, because that leads on to my next question. As a Scottish National Party politician, I would say that the internal market act is an act of political intervention. It has been done by the UK Government for a specific reason: to limit the ability of devolved Administrations to make the differences that they want to make in their areas of responsibility.
We are talking about taking the politics out of it. Previously, we worked with the common frameworks. We would take the politics out of it, go to a wee room and argue about what the way forward should be. We would then come back with a settlement on how we had agreed to go forward. That approach would probably help businesses. We would say, “Here are the rules and regulations”—exactly as Marc Strathie spoke about—and, “Here is how we are going forward with policy. Both Governments have agreed to it, so let’s get on”. My argument is that the internal market act has created the political situation that we now find ourselves in. I know that you cannot and will not comment on that opinion, but there are, or were, better ways of working that would create the stability that the marketplace is looking for.
09:45Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
George Adam
It is a bit of stakeholder engagement.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
George Adam
Good morning, everyone. I would like to ask about devolved authority in general. We have come to the conclusion that there can be diversion, as Patrick Harvie said, when there is political will to do things slightly differently.
At the moment, under the internal market act, the devolved Governments are looked on as the junior partners in the whole process, and that is what is causing the problem. How could Scotland implement policies that reflect local needs and priorities using the current internal market act mechanism? I am interested in how you think we could do that rather than us politicians telling you how we think we should do it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
George Adam
One of the things that you said in your opening remarks was that it is down to us all—the various stakeholders and everyone else—to try to deliver the bill. Therefore, my initial question is: how is the Scottish Government engaging with the Promise progress framework, and is that engagement on-going?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
George Adam
How are we engaging with the Promise progress framework, and is that engagement on-going?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
George Adam
As information comes in from the data in the framework, and as the work continues with stakeholders, how does the Government plan to evolve the framework while addressing some of the issues that might come up through the process? Is there flexibility for you to do that? You might say that you are doing that already.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
George Adam
You mentioned in your opening remarks that the framework consolidates 50 national data streams. That is quite a bit. How do you manage to be flexible, take all that data on board and make it part of the delivery process for the Promise?
09:45