The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 926 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
George Adam
No, I get that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
George Adam
The report said that because of the impact on the game and—as you said—because the game would be seen by as many people as possible. In the end, more people would see the game.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
George Adam
Sir Mark, your record speaks for itself. You are dealing with the situation now to try to fix it. One of the other things that you said in that statement was:
“openness, transparency and good governance is at the heart of everything that we do.”
That is important. Can I get a commitment now, which I think that you have hinted at, that as you go through this process, the committee will be able to get information and be involved? Like you, we want you to succeed, but the problem is that you are a public organisation and allegations have been made very publicly, so we must find a way to get to the other end. Given that openness and transparency are at the heart of everything that you are doing, can we ensure that the committee is involved as well?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
George Adam
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
George Adam
Good, because I would say that it is a particular issue with sport. A lot of people do it to access sport in general.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
George Adam
That report also said that free-to-air TV was probably the best route.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
George Adam
Good morning, Ian. It is nice to see you again. I will not go on about the fact that you are a St Mirren legend; most people would not know that, but I ask you to take that into account when I ask my questions. This is not personal, but what the hell is the video assistant referee all about?
I come to my question on the issue that we are discussing. You say that television rights are a third of your turnover, but the convener is right that it is almost a quasi-secret society activity to try to trace the money from UEFA to your body. It was only from a press release that I managed to work out that the money is a third—or 33 per cent—of your budget. Is it not a bit of an issue for us as fans or as the committee that it is difficult for us to follow the money in our national game? You are saying that most of it goes into grass-roots football and women’s football, but it is difficult to follow the money when it comes from UEFA.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
George Adam
Good morning. I will use the Gillies report as a starter. As we have all said at various points today, the report was about the lack of leadership and the leadership culture in the past, but we are back at this point again.
To use Mr Hamill’s example of going to commercial lenders to try to regenerate various parts of the campus and to get equipment for some of the departments, it is normal for a university to try to do something like that. On the whole, though, commercial bankers tend to want to see a strategy and a leadership group that will be there in the long term. However, you might not be there in the next 12 to 18 months.
Given what you are looking at now, is this not a crisis of some priority? From what I can make out—and please correct me if I am wrong—at least four senior posts are still held as interim positions. Would it not be a priority to get to the stage where we can look at people who will be doing that work in the long term? A commercial banker would look at it and say, “Yes, Professor Seaton. That’s all well and good. It’s a great plan, but you’re not going to be here in 18 months.”
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
George Adam
Appointing a chair is your number 1 priority. You have to get that and then work your way down the list of the various processes from there. The point is that it is holding back the idea of the university moving forward. I know that the university is at a crisis point at the moment, but we need to get it into a better place.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
George Adam
Good morning. The definitions are one of the things that I am trying to get my head around. As you have quite rightly said, the teaching trade unions have issues, to put it mildly, with the definition. They will have to deal with it day in and day out, so it will be very difficult for them. There are legal concerns, as well as concerns about what the definition is.
My concern is around what would happen if a teacher was trying to stop a child from doing something that they should not be doing. The definition is so tight that if a teacher grabbed a child who was going to jump in front of a car, that could be construed as restraining a child. I know that that is an extreme example, but it could be seen as some form of restraint. Where do we draw the line? I have some concerns that the definition seems pretty vague and it could be opened up to all kinds of interpretation. The key worry is about where it could end up.