The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 670 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
And that would be regardless of the issue. The argument that I am trying to make is whether that should be looked at by the SFC.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
I am interested in that point, as it is kind of making my argument. We are saying that we must get people from poorer backgrounds into higher education and FE, with FE as the introduction. When we are considering the funding, we should perhaps be looking at it from that perspective. Where are the access points? How are we going to do it? Who are the ones who are actually delivering? That is the argument that I am making, and I would hope that others will listen to it, too.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
Let us just have a wee debate about it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
I will refer to the written information on retention that we received. Twenty-one per cent of OU students come from deprived areas. For UWS, that figure is 29 per cent, and 44 per cent of them—nearly 45 per cent—are first-generation students. Based on those figures, an argument could be made, as I talked to the commissioner about, for the SFC to look at the issue in a more flexible way, because the support for those programmes costs each of the institutions a bit of money. The commissioner said that there are certain areas in Scotland, mainly because of their demographic make-up, that will be doing such work to the extreme. Is there an argument for funding those institutions more to encourage them to hit the targets, because that is where the need is?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
I am coming from the aspect of 45 per cent first-generation university students. The families of a lot of the students who go to UWS, or of SIMD 20 students, will not know what going to university is like. It is not that those students get no support—their family will support them, of course—but it is not a world that they will know a lot about. It is about the family, not just the individual. The family needs to be given support to ensure that the young person gets the opportunity.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
The argument that I am trying to make is that we could move the funding away from certain places to others.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
Good morning, Professor McKendrick. On the back of what my colleague John Mason has said about SIMD, I want to say that he and I have known each other for a very long time, and he is an accountant at heart who wants that one data set that he can work on.
I think that a basket of measures are needed. You have mentioned some of them. Having just one data set on its own would not be the way forward. SIMD might be a good measure in some areas, but not in others. Everybody talks about rural areas, but in some urban areas, it might work for one street but not for the street next to it. Is it not better to have a basket of measures, or am I just overcomplicating things?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
Professor McKendrick, I apologise for anything that I might have said when you were refereeing at St Mirren park in the past. It was entirely of the moment and not personal.
In my area, Paisley, we have the University of the West of Scotland, which is similar to your own Glasgow Caledonian University and does well in recruiting young people to university. Unlike a lot of other universities, where access is straight from school, access to those universities is normally through college—perhaps people returning to education or going to college slightly later in life. Can more be done in the sector to work with colleges and schools to see whether they can help you with the work that you are trying to do?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
George Adam
Rather than anything else, I was probably coming at this from the aspect that Glasgow Caley and UWS get a better funding package, because they seem to be the ones that continually hit the figures.
I know that you cannot answer this, but my argument has always been that some of the ancient universities can carry on without Government funding. The University of St Andrews survived the reformation, for example. I am not saying that that is a Government position—it is just a thought that I have had. For some of the other universities, 70 per cent of their funding comes from the Government. There might be a way to have more flexibility, and that could be a way forward for us. We could at least have the debate.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
George Adam
Good morning, everyone.
Lucy Ozanne said that some small producers in the industry that she represents have just given up exporting to the EU, that some are finding it difficult and that others are finding other ways to make things work. What are they doing? Most businesses in Scotland are small and medium-sized enterprises. How are they making up for the loss of revenue?