The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 684 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
I take that on board. We will have a look and see what we can come back with.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
It is getting better. As I always say, if something is broken, I want to fix it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
Well, with section 5, we do not need to do any primary legislation.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
Stephen, you have just won officials bingo: elected conveners is one of the topics that we said might have an outside chance of coming up this morning.
It is for the Parliament to decide on that issue, too. If the Parliament decides to go down that route, the Government will engage, as one of the major players. It is for Parliament to make that decision, however.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
I do not think that there is any policy within the SNP as to how we go forward on that issue.
10:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
There are processes before things get to a free vote. The chief whip would probably never forgive a former chief whip for making a suggestion like that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
Ironically, when we had the discussion with the Electoral Commission yesterday, I had my Minister for Parliamentary Business hat on and I was saying that it would be a case of stage 1, stage 2, stage 3, royal assent and—boom!—job done. The person I was speaking to said, “Yes, but the secondary legislation, minister,” to which I responded, “Oh, yes.”
We have worked it through and we are in a safe place to have the proposed legislation set out to the right timescales.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
I would like to say a few words, if that would be okay, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
I would need to see more detail and to discuss it further to see how we would go forward with that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
George Adam
Not tomorrow, but imminently.
As I have said—and I state again on the public record—I want that bill to be seen as the Parliament’s bill. It is a Scottish Government bill, but we are talking about the very heart and soul of our democracy and it has to be seen to be the Parliament’s bill.
I will want to speak to you, convener, and probably to Mr Kerr in his role in that regard in the Conservative Party, and to other political parties, about what I am planning on bringing forward, when we get to that stage, as it is important that you buy into the bill at an early stage. In addition, if I suggest something, you can point out if you think that I may have gone down a rabbit hole on one or two items. I want to get to the point at which, when we discuss the bill as introduced, it will literally be about the detail and, when we get to stage 2, it will be about the detail of how we make the bill better, should that be required.