The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 965 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
Catherine Houlihan, does it affect you as well?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
That is a whole other inquiry for us.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
What concerns me is that my grandchildren seem to be more interested in K-pop than they are in anything else, but that is a country that has spent quite a bit of money on culture over the decades. Maybe there is a lesson for us there.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
Why does BBC Scotland not do that? After all, that is the modern way, particularly with television production; you get a partner and you make the programme. Why does it not do more of that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
I can hear the arguments that will be made when the CMA starts talking about ITV—they will be about the plucky Brits trying to fight the big international streamers. The problem is that, as Nick McGowan-Lowe rightly says, it is an America-based company that will be taking over, so it is part of the internationalisation of the media.
Professor Beveridge said earlier that he was concerned that anything that might have been influenced by President Trump might be of concern. Looking at the news in America automatically gives us some concerns about whether we will go down that route as well. No disrespect to ITV, but ITV’s morning show, “Good Morning Britain”, is very Americanised and it is completely different from other such shows. It would be concerning if we were to have that format throughout news in the UK. Nick, do you have anything to add on that point?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
Professor Beveridge, you mentioned Comcast, which bought Sky a few years ago and nobody thought anything of it. Now, Sky wants to merge with ITV, and it is trying to say that it will have a great British broadcaster fighting against the big world streamers. However, as you rightly said, Sky is owned by Comcast, which is a US-based company. I was interested in what you said, because it is something that I have also brought up. In a few years’ time, Ofcom will not be the problem; it will do what it does and just let the broadcasters do what they want. The Competition and Markets Authority will be the problem, because it will say that the merged company is creating a monopoly or cutting down competition for advertising. A few years down the line, once ITV and Sky get through all that, that will probably be when they look at STV, because £55 million is not a lot of money to Comcast.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
One of the bigger issues is about STV North news being broadcast from Glasgow. There has been a slight change, because Ofcom managed to snarl a wee bit at STV and change it slightly so that there will be more opt-outs, but that move is still taking away from the area. That is a big decision now, but if we end up with a company such as Comcast, for example, in charge of STV, our question would be, is STV still in Glasgow? We are talking about a company that owns NBC, Universal Studios and so on—it is massive.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
That is another concern.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
On the other side, it is trying to access an audience that it does not currently have. I am probably part of that key audience, and I quite like the changes, but is it too little, too late, or is it a step in the right direction?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
George Adam
Funny that you mentioned Ofcom. Next week’s meeting will be interesting, because it is as useful as a chocolate fireguard most of the time.
My next question is for you, Nick Lowe-McGowan; it is on STV North’s position. Your submission mentions that the share price has halved in the first 12 months under chief executive Rufus Radcliffe. It is a talent for someone to manage to do that during the early days of being involved with a company.
You also said about the ITV-Sky takeover talks, and this was mentioned by Professor Beveridge, that
“in the event of such an approved takeover one outcome could be that Sky/Comcast also look to secure the remaining two licences with a takeover of STV, especially at the reduced price of (currently) £55m.”
That is a perfectly realistic scenario. It could happen once it gets over the hurdles of the CMA, and it would probably have a similar process to go through if it made a bid for STV. However, if we are talking about Scottish broadcasting and Scottish voices in news, that reality is that it will be worse than the STV North thing—I mean, we will be arguing about whether there will be an STV in Glasgow. How realistic do you think that prospect is and, if it happened, what would be the future of broadcasting in Scotland, particularly from the NUJ’s perspective?