The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 684 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
George Adam
That is what I was thinking, based on the evidence. I have come to the conclusion that, if we had not legislated but had simply made changes, we would not have got the belief out there in the real world, among parents and everyone else, that things are going to be different.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
George Adam
Sorry.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
George Adam
Based on my time as a member of the committee and my time as Minister for Parliamentary Business, I note that people are always saying that we must legislate on this, that we need some legislation to do that, or that they want something to be on the first page of a bill. In this case, unusually, we have heard from a lot of people that some of it could have been done without our having to legislate. Culture change has been one of the issues, for example. What do you say to the arguments that have come up in our evidence sessions that we may have been able to do things slightly differently? That evidence has been highly unusual because, normally, people are always saying that we should legislate.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
George Adam
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
George Adam
We have to ensure that they have that voice. The EIS always made it sound as if—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
George Adam
The evidence that we have taken—you have said this, too, cabinet secretary—is that the national bodies, and the SQA in particular, can seem too distant, and trust in the SQA has been eroded. Some witnesses have told the committee that they feel that this is just a rebranding exercise. It is almost as though this is the new improved SQA—like the Daz super-white challenge. Is there a difference between how it has worked and how it will work? How will it be better than what we currently have?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2024
George Adam
Good morning, cabinet secretary. Unlike Mr Bibby, when I see challenges, I try to think of ways of solving them. Perhaps that in itself is telling, as we move forward with this. Thank you for explaining to those who are having difficulty with it how the budget process works, cabinet secretary, but I think that there is something else that is telling, and Mr Bibby may well have accidentally stumbled on to a solution to the problem.
There is talk about uncertainty on the budget, and that is because of the way in which the devolution settlement works—that has always been the case. I have been here long enough and have been in enough committees across different portfolios to know that the same argument is made in relation to other portfolios as well. Mr Bibby has stumbled upon the idea that, if we had multiyear budgets from the UK Government, that might be a solution and might help with moving away from the uncertainty, difficulties and challenges in many of the sectors that the Government supports.
10:00Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2024
George Adam
In the past, some people—not you—have almost talked down the culture sector. However, traditionally, the sector has dealt with challenging political and financial times, and it has always been very resilient. In fact, you and I will remember the dim and dark 1980s, when the culture sector was Scotland—it was our political voice, because this place did not exist. Surely, the culture sector is not in the place that some people say. It has always been a resilient sector that has been able to come forward with new ways of working and new ideas to push forward Scotland in the world.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2024
George Adam
I have one final question, which is on the review of Creative Scotland. Various creative organisations have given evidence during the budget process. You mentioned that Creative Scotland has not changed since its inception. I might have a wee bit of skin in this game, because I asked Iain Munro what the point is of him and of Creative Scotland. I might have been a wee bit brutal with him, but that was basically because I was not getting answers. I then got a history lesson on why a national arts council was created after the war.
Given what Mr Harvie said about the games industry and given that Screen Scotland, as an offshoot of Creative Scotland, has been an absolute screaming success, if we are looking at changing or reviewing Creative Scotland, there are surely different ways of working and Creative Scotland maybe needs to start thinking about coming into the 21st century and moving forward.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
George Adam
Good morning. I will follow on from Bill Kidd’s questions about inspections. Do you think that the inspection process should be more prescriptive, or do you believe that it should be more flexible? We have heard different views from different people and different organisations on that. From your description, it is a bit of both: you are there to do a job and you have some flexibility as to how you go about it. However, that is not what we heard from the EIS and some of the other teaching unions. How does the bill relate to that, and do you have any ideas as to how we move forward on it?