The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 740 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
With regard to the relationship between your office and the Scottish Human Rights Commission, your office existed first and the Human Rights Commission came later. If we had already had a human rights commission, would we still have needed a children’s commissioner?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you for those answers. Just so that I and other members are clear, are you telling me that you could incorporate those roles but it would require your mandate being looked at? Are you telling me that, as it stands, you do not believe that the Scottish Human Rights Commission properly represents the views of disabled or older people?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is helpful, because I think that I now understand. In effect, you are telling me that the issue is capacity rather than powers. Is that correct?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, and welcome. The mandate that we have been given by the Finance and Public Administration Committee is to look at two broad areas. One is whether there are any gaps or overlaps in the work of existing commissioners. The other is the proposals that are in the pipeline, which you will be aware of, to create new commissioners.
I would like to explore those issues together, because there is obvious synergy between them. We have proposals in the pipeline for a commissioner for the disabled and a commissioner for older people, and we already have the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland. Is there any reason why the work that you are doing cannot encompass the work that is proposed to be done or that is already being done for sectional groups, as they might be called?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
As we all know, human rights are partly devolved and partly reserved. There is the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which is a United Kingdom body that has a Scotland office, and there is you—the Scottish Human Rights Commission. Is there a particular reason why we have two separate organisations in the same space?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
I think that you were in the room and heard the previous panel’s evidence. I will ask you exactly the same question that I asked the Scottish Human Rights Commission. For context, the committee’s remit is to look at the gaps and overlaps between existing commissioners and the case and criteria for establishing new ones. You will be familiar with a number of proposals that are in the pipeline for new commissioners. For example, there are proposals for new commissioners for the disabled and for older people. Given your role as the Children and Young People’s Commissioner, do you think that you could make any argument against there being another commissioner for either of those groups?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
We will shortly hear from the Children’s and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland. The SHRC obviously post-dates the creation of that office. If it had been the other way round, would we need a separate children’s commissioner?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Let me rephrase the question. Is there any general policy reason why, given your reach into all the various areas including disabled and older people, the work that you do on human rights could not also encompass children?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
With respect, I understand all that, but the committee has been established precisely because there is an appetite to revisit such questions, which is why I asked you that one. Let me try again. Is there any reason, in broad policy terms, why the work of the Scottish Human Rights Commission could not incorporate that of the children’s commissioner?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
I am sorry to interrupt, Paul, but you said that Mr McKee “made an attempt”. Are you actually seeing an improvement in outcomes?