The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 740 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Leon Thompson from UK Hospitality.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, cabinet secretary. Good morning, Dr Malik—it is nice to see you. Dr Malik and I shared a very interesting visit to Sidey, in Perth, for Scottish apprenticeship week. We might come back to that in a minute.
Cabinet secretary, in your opening remarks you talked about how the Government has built good, strong relationships with business. The deputy convener referenced the evidence that we got from Tony Rodgers, from Emtelle UK Ltd. Emtelle is a Scotland-headquartered manufacturing company with international operations employing hundreds of people. I will quote from the Official Report what he said to us.
“I have no interaction with the Scottish Government whatsoever. I had never heard of this new deal and had no idea about it. Quite frankly, when I have approached the Scottish Government, it has been very difficult, as a businessperson in Scotland, to make any sort of contact or inroads, or to make any kind of representation of a case.”—[Official Report, Economy and Fair Work Committee, 26 February 2025; c 2.]
That is a direct quote from what he told us. Does that suggest that there is still an issue? Emtelle is a business in the tech sector—a high-growth sector—that you would have thought should be precisely at the heart of what the Government is trying to do, yet Mr Rodgers told us that he has never even heard of the new deal.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Let me pick one more example. As I said, Dr Malik and I took part in an interesting visit during Scottish apprenticeship week. As part of that visit—and other visits that I and the committee took part in—the issue kept being raised with us that the apprenticeship levy is paid by businesses in Scotland but they do not see the value coming back from that compared to companies operating south of the border. Is that on your agenda, cabinet secretary?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Dr Malik, do you want to add anything?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
To be fair, Mr Rodgers told us that he would have welcomed engagement. Have you reached out to him?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you.
On that point, the Fraser of Allander Institute publishes a Scottish business monitor every year, and its most recent report, in October, told us that 9 per cent of those who responded agreed that the Scottish Government understands the business environment, whereas 62 per cent disagreed. The same survey, in October 2024, said that just 6 per cent of businesses believe that the Scottish Government engages effectively. That figure was down from 8 per cent the previous year, and there was a net figure of minus 62 per cent. That suggests that there is a gap in terms of people believing that the Government is engaging properly with businesses.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Go ahead.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
I asked about outputs. As you have taken hospitality as an example, what are the specific outputs in hospitality that the new deal for business has delivered?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
But the end point was the same in that MUP was still increased, which is not what the industry wanted.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning.
I will pick up on what Colin Smyth said, which is a good starting point. I want to follow up on the convener’s thread. You will have followed the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s discussions on the matter. The core of our work is to understand the role of commissioners and the gap that they are attempting to fill.
With a population of 5.5 million, Scotland is a relatively small country. We have 129 MSPs and 57 MPs, and we have 28 ministers and law officers, so we are not exactly undergoverned at the present time. What gap are commissioners filling? Is their existence simply an admission that the other current structures are not working properly? Is not there a better way to address the issue?
Given that we are relatively short of time, I will ask my second question at the same time. You have all made specific proposals, and there are other proposals out there that I have heard about. For example, it has been proposed that there should be a commissioner for individuals with autism—for the neurodiverse community. There will be a long list of other interest groups that believe that they should have a commissioner, too. Where do we stop? How many commissioners should we end up with—or are you simply saying, “I want my commissioner, and that’ll be it”?
Jeremy Balfour is smiling, so I will go to him first.