Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 740 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Product Regulation and Metrology Bill

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

Good morning, minister and colleagues.

Thank you for setting out your view on the LCM in your opening statement. It is fair to say that the advice to the committee from the Scottish Parliament information centre is that this is an area in which lines between what is devolved and what is reserved are quite blurry, and it is quite difficult to distinguish between what might be a reserved competence and what might be a devolved competence. For example, regulations covering technical standards for products are reserved, but regulations relating to efficiency and effectiveness might not be, and it is perhaps difficult to distinguish between the two.

It would be helpful if you or your officials could give us some practical examples of areas in which a conflict might arise, if you are able to do so. That might better explain your hesitancy about granting consent.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Product Regulation and Metrology Bill

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

Thank you for confirming the complexity of the issue, which is helpful in itself.

Can I ask about one more thing? You referred to EU alignment. With regard to regulation powers in this area, is there anything that the Scottish Government would do differently from the UK Government, or is it too early to make that prediction? I know that the Scottish Government’s general approach is to progress with EU alignment where possible, but would the Scottish Government seek to do that even if it meant taking an approach that was different from that of the UK Government?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

You mentioned in passing the Prestwick spaceport, which was dropped, and we understand the reasons for that. What will happen to the funding that was allocated for that? Will it simply drop away? Are you seeking to redeploy it elsewhere? Can you explain that?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

I go back to the question of funding, which was touched on earlier in Daniel Johnson’s questions. I have two specific questions. To save time, I will ask both of them at the same time.

First, to what extent have you sought to draw in any private sector funding for your deals, and how successful has that been?

Secondly, how have you sought to interact with other sources of public sector funding, such as levelling up funds, shared prosperity funds, the Scottish National Investment Bank or research and innovation funding? Going beyond the narrow scope of the funding in the deals, have you been able to look at other public sector sources?

Mr O’Farrell, you are looking at me, so I will start with you.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

Given that you are in the unique position of straddling the border between Scotland and England, is there any difference in the approach to funding in England in comparison with Scotland?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

That is interesting. Thank you.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

My second question is on a slightly different topic, which is the timescale for the deal. The Glasgow city deal has the longest timescale, at 20 years. For some, it is 15 years, although for most it is 10 years.

We are now 10 years into the Glasgow city deal. The world looked very different 10 years ago, and it will look even more different 10 years from now. Is the timescale realistic? What impact does it have on planning for projects? Are the projects that you have picked to be part of the deals timeless projects, in effect, that will have a benefit regardless of the changes over two decades?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Murdo Fraser

Good morning. I want to follow on from the convener’s line of questioning. I suspect, given what you have said in response to him, that I probably know the answer to this question already, but I will ask it anyway.

If we did not have the city deals, would the projects have proceeded at all? Last year, the committee went to visit the Aberdeen south harbour project, for example, and we saw the work that has been done there. There is also the Inverness castle development—I say to Matt Bailey that I am an Invernessian by birth, so it is great to see the castle being brought back into use as a tourist asset.

If we did not have the city deals, what would be the prospects for developments like those proceeding? Who wants to start?

I see that Stuart Bews wants to come in.

You should not bother touching the buttons, by the way—they will be controlled remotely.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Murdo Fraser

Does Audit Scotland have any observations on this?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Murdo Fraser

Thanks.

My second question touches on what Mr McInroy said in answer to my first, but it goes in a slightly different direction. The time period for most of the deals is 10 years; some are 15; and Glasgow’s is 20. Given how fast the economy and society are changing, can we realistically make a judgment now on whether a project will, in 20 years’ time, deliver the benefits that we think are appropriate today?