The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 740 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
You sound quite dismissive.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Is the new deal for business not a means of connecting the Government to the very organisations that you are talking about? Do you think that it is not fulfilling that role?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I will ask this question of Colin Borland first, because he is a kind of veteran—if he does not mind my saying that—of the business space over a number of years.
In the past decade and more, we have seen countless relaunches, new initiatives, forums, working groups and resets come and go. Some have been set up with great fanfare but have then petered out. Is the new deal for business different from what has gone before? If so, how?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you. I will bring in the other panel members.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is a helpful answer. I am going to ask a follow-up question and then will bring in other witnesses who want to comment.
I take it from what you are saying that we should judge the new deal on the basis of outcomes rather than inputs, so what is the new deal for business delivering that is actually different from what went before? We have just gone through a budget cycle and the committee has done budget scrutiny—for example, by looking at issues such as non-domestic rates, because support for retail, hospitality and leisure is stronger south of the border than it is in Scotland. We have looked at funding for the enterprise agencies and VisitScotland, and we have looked at employability schemes, which have seen a substantial real-terms cut in their funding in the past two years.
Can you point to specific outcomes that you think have been delivered because of the new deal for business and that would not otherwise have been delivered?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay, but the point that I am trying to get to and what the committee is trying to find out is whether the new deal for business has made a difference.
10:00SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I was very taken with what you said about your right to require information from bodies, including the Scottish Government. Opposition members of the Parliament will feel very jealous that you have that power and we do not, although my colleagues around the table who are former ministers might take a different view on that matter.
I want to ask about the setting of criteria for the creation of new supported bodies. One of the primary reasons why this committee was established was to look at the demands—as you know, there are a number of proposals in the parliamentary pipeline to establish new commissioners—and whether they would provide good value for money, given that the Finance and Public Administration Committee, in its report, came to conclusions about whether that would be an appropriate way to proceed with the public sector landscape.
I read your submission, in which you made some interesting comments around how the current criteria for creating new supported bodies might be enhanced, including the need for there to be a demonstrable gap in service or oversight. Will you explain how you think the criteria could be amended?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Please be so.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
That answer goes to the heart of why this committee has been established. Such issues are at the root of our discussions.
I want to ask about the specific example of the patient safety commissioner. This morning, when I was listening to “Good Morning Scotland” on the train, I learned that the latest round of recruitment—the second attempt to recruit someone to be the patient safety commissioner—has been unsuccessful. I am a bit surprised by that, because it sounds like a very attractive salary and package, but apparently the recruitment has not worked. Even though someone was identified through the process and offered the position, they turned it down, for whatever reason, so the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body will have to look again. Clearly, there is an issue.
The FPA Committee suggested that, if the existing criteria had been properly followed, a patient safety commissioner would not, in fact, have been established. It suggested that such a commissioner could have sat in your office with the SPSO. I am interested in your thoughts on whether your office could have accommodated that, rather than a new office being created, given that we cannot even find someone to do the job.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is interesting. As you are stepping down as the SPSO, did you think about applying for the job yourself?