The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 740 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is a similar position to the one that we are in, as it is usually Opposition members of Parliament who propose a new commissioner. Were the proposals rejected on the basis that they did not meet the criteria?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
The criteria were created in 1989. Have they been reviewed or updated? Is there a review mechanism for them or are they quite settled?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
It does sound like that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is all that I have to ask. Do you want to add a comment on anything that we have yet to cover about the criteria for creating new officers?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning—or, rather, good evening, Dr Wilson. Morning for us; evening for you.
I will ask about the criteria for creating new officers, which is the issue that in effect led to this committee being established. There are a number of proposals to set up new commissioners, and we have been tasked with looking at how that is taken forward. What does the decision-making process for creating new officers of Parliament look like? What are the different avenues? Could you give us examples of where new officers have been proposed and who was consulted? How does that all come together?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is really helpful. That is quite a long list of officers that have been proposed. Do those proposals come only from the Government, or do they come from elsewhere, such as from members of Parliament and so on?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have a final question, given what you have just said about the principle that new officers of Parliament should be created only rarely, and that none has been created since 1989. If there is a compelling need to do so, how does the committee balance that with the requirement to create new officers only rarely? How does that issue get resolved?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning to the panel. There are a couple of things that I want to pick up on. I will start off with Susan Love, because she mentioned in passing the apprenticeship levy. When we meet employers, the issue is raised with us continually that they pay into the apprenticeship levy but there is very little transparency as to what happens to that money, unlike the situation south of the border. I am interested in getting any perspectives that you have on the transparency of the apprenticeship levy funding and whether you think that there are lessons we could learn in Scotland from what happens elsewhere in the UK.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
Does anyone else want to come in on this? Ian Hughes, do you have a comment to make on the apprenticeship levy?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have a slightly different question, and I will again start with Susan Love, because Susan and I have discussed this issue before.
Graduate apprenticeships seem to tick lots of boxes. They are very popular with employers and with students, who graduate without large sums of debt. They have been earning for four years and are far more work ready than if they had gone down a purely academic route. Why are we not making more progress in providing graduate apprenticeship places? Last week, James Withers told us that the city of Manchester has more graduate apprenticeships available than the whole of Scotland. It seems such an obvious opportunity. Why are we not doing more with it?