The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 924 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Murdo Fraser
I want to press you on that a little.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay. Can I ask you to expand on that? You say that you want “something” to protect them. What more do you have in mind?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Murdo Fraser
Indeed. Otherwise, we rely on the court to decide whether wilful stupidity counts as good faith or not.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Murdo Fraser
When you say “legislative guidance”, what do you have in mind?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I want to touch on a slightly different topic: the issue of trading in digital assets, including, in particular, the protections in the bill for acquirers in good faith. I would be interested in hearing any thoughts that you have on, first, the principle that acquirers in good faith get a protection that, clearly, acts to the disadvantage of the original owner of the asset and, secondly, whether the definition of “good faith” in the bill is sufficient. Who would like to start?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Murdo Fraser
The bill covers good faith, but there is no mention of due diligence. Is the implication, then, that good faith means that the buyer has to do due diligence?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Murdo Fraser
This will be my final question on the topic. Is the bill fine in this respect, or do you think that it needs to be improved?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
The bill provides that the purchase must be “for value”, but the expert reference group had suggested the term “onerous consideration”. Do you have any view as to why the bill uses different language?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you. You have explained the rationale for that choice well, but perhaps I can just tease out some of the detail a little more. What is your understanding of the requirement, in section 4(2) of the bill, for “good faith”? How would that be demonstrated in practice?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
Would there be any requirement on the purchaser in that scenario to have done any form of due diligence, or would it simply be a negative?