Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1199 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

So you think that a public interest test needs to be set out more explicitly in the bill.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Thanks. I turn to Max Wiszniewski, because he offered up a quotation from someone who is experiencing a challenging situation associated with the land adjacent to them, which has been managed and used in a way that causes them a significant amount of difficulty.

It has been suggested that there should be scope to make anonymous complaints. I understand, from what I have heard, that there is a concern that there could be repercussions for individuals or organisations that make a complaint, that doing so could have a significant impact on them and that having anonymity would give them protection from that.

Should there be a provision in the bill for anonymous complaints? It may be that, in making an anonymous complaint, an individual or organisation would give details of who they are, but the Land Commission would withhold their identity.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Sarah Madden, I put that question to you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

David, do you want to comment?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Is the list that the Scottish Land Commission has suggested the right group to which the qualification should be expanded? Is anything missing? [Interruption.]

I put that question to Sarah.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Apologies for missing that you had put your hand up, Tara. Could you give us a bit more detail? What is the form of the intimidation that is experienced? How does it manifest itself?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

We should also recognise that there might be a power imbalance in the relationship, and we should consider how that should be balanced to manage some of the associated risk when dealing with complaints or issues.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Just to understand what you said in response to Kevin Stewart, you as an organisation would have no problem with publishing the list of those who happen to be in Gresham House forest fund VI, so that we can see exactly who has invested in that piece of land.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

We can clarify that through other means.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

I am conscious of witnesses raising the concern about the potential for unintended consequences around some of the thresholds that have been set and how they might impact on land. Would it be more appropriate to deal with any threshold issues through regulation as opposed to the bill? From a parliamentary perspective, it would mean that you could change the threshold without the need to go back to primary legislation. If significant issues started to emerge, you could deal with them within months, through the introduction of regulations to the Parliament. Would that be a useful safeguard against any issues being brought about through unintended consequences?