The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 730 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
I understand that, but I do not understand why you are asserting that it is not necessary to spell that out in the bill, given that, as I understand it, we spell it out in other legislation. Why not spell it out in this bill, too?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
So, there is nothing to prohibit such a test’s inclusion, then. It is just that at the present time how you have drafted the bill is your preferred option.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
You will be aware that, in its supplementary evidence to the committee and in its advice to ministers, the Scottish Land Commission made two recommendations on how the new commissioner should operate. The first is that the land and communities commissioner should consult the land commissioners and the tenant farming commissioner on their investigations before submitting a report or making recommendations to ministers. The second is that, if the new commissioner investigates breaches that pertain to the duties around land management plans and makes recommendations, they should consult the land commissioners and the tenant farming commissioner on their findings and recommendations. Are you minded to support those recommendations?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Part of the challenge is ensuring that land management plans are a meaningful process for communities to engage with and that they deliver greater transparency with regard to how land is going to be managed but in a way that is not unduly burdensome to the point that managing the plan is not practical. How do you envisage achieving that balance, given the competing tensions of what different people are looking for from land management plans?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay. Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay. Let us examine the approach to lotting that is set out in the bill. I understand that the transfer test will be a public interest test, but I still struggle to understand why we would not put on a statutory footing, through the bill, some form of public interest test duty for the factors that will be taken into consideration in decisions about lotting, for example. Why does the bill not set that on a statutory footing?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Good afternoon, Richard. You have been a member of the board since the setting up of ESS, as you mentioned in your opening contribution. What would you bring specifically to the role of chair of the board, if you were appointed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
You mentioned in your opening contribution that you thought that ESS had been doing well since it was established. What do you think it has been doing well, and not doing well, during your time on the board?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay. I will take that as you being open to persuasion on the possible timeframe.
I turn to the way in which land management plans are to be taken forward and who is to take them forward. As the bill stands, the land management plans are intended only for pieces of land of more than 3,000 hectares, and that is limited to single, composite and contiguous holdings.
The cabinet secretary will be well aware of the significant commercial holdings of land that are owned by companies and that are all under the threshold, although in some cases those companies are in the top five landholders in Scotland. They would be left out. They would not be covered by the existing definition of how land management plans should be applied. Has any thought been given to including aggregated or corporate holdings in a way that would allow us to make sure that we are capturing what are very significant landholders who, because of the nature of the parcel of land that they own, fall under the threshold for a land management plan?
10:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
I do not understand why we cannot spell out in the bill what will be considered in the public interest test duty. Why can we not do that? We do it in other legislation, do we not?