The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 763 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Does Jon or Linda want to contribute on this question?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
I was just taking on board your point about the lack of a definition of “community” and testing whether you have a clear understanding of what you think should be applied in defining that against what is proposed in the bill. I take it from what you said that you think that it should not be in the bill, but should be addressed in guidance. That could be more principle based, rather than being overly prescriptive, to help to define what a community is. Is that a fair reflection of what you are saying?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Section 6 will establish the land and communities commissioner. Has the Government got the establishment of the commissioner right?
11:15Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Good morning, and thank you for your evidence so far. I want to go back to the point about the 3,000 hectare threshold that is set out in the bill. Beyond what is stated in the policy memorandum, why do you think that the 3,000-hectare figure has been selected and not the 500-hectare figure that you have suggested?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
However, I am taking that as a “wrong”.
I turn to Jon Hollingdale. In your evidence on consultation on land management plans and engagement, you raised concerns about the lack of a definition of “community” in the bill. Will you expand on what you mean by that? Do you have a definition that you believe should be in the legislation? If so, should it be in the text of the bill or in the regulatory provisions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
As a word of caution, I note that I would not use community councils as the marker here because, even in urban areas, many of them do not function due to a lack of members.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
That gives you more flexibility if it is not working properly.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
My reading of what you are saying is that you think that the threshold of disqualification is sufficient, but the risks associated with the issue of potential conflict are better managed by the commissioner being based within the Land Commission. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
The Scottish Land Commission recommended that a public interest test be applied to transfers, but the Government has chosen to go for a transfer test instead. Why do you think that it has taken that approach, and not a public interest one?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Are you saying that you do not believe that the land and communities commissioner should be a stand-alone commissioner and that they should be part of the Scottish Land Commission? Is that correct?