Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 3 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 881 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Thank you.

Turning to the changes in the rules on good husbandry and good estate management, I note that, in his contribution, Mr Oates referred to the issue of sustainability and regenerative practices and how they can be quite difficult to define. The bill changes the rules in that respect, with specific reference to “sustainable and regenerative agriculture”. Do you think that the right approach has been taken to changing those rules? Could the provision be further improved to give greater clarity?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

That is helpful. I am not sure whether Martin Hall was referring to this in his comments, but the bill as drafted does not make provision in relation to charging for tenants’ improvements. Should the bill contain such a provision, given that it is in the original 1991 act?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

How long will the consultation last for and when will the finalised document be published?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

I am not really asking you about the due process that you presently follow as a regulator. The claim in the consultation is that the change is needed because the existing procedure

“results in delays, rarely results in a change of outcome, and is of limited utility”.

That is a direct quote from the consultation document and the findings of the review. Does that match your experience as the regulator, with responsibility for implementing the call-in procedure? I find it quite hard to believe that, as the regulator, you have no view on your experience of using the call-in procedure. It is quite a simple question; it is not a trick. To be very clear, I am asking you whether what is reflected in the document accurately reflects your experience.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

So you do not have an opinion on the call-in procedure.

Regarding the existing system, the consultation document states that, to judge from practical experience,

“the procedure ... rarely results in a change of outcome”

but often

“results in delays”,

with very little change. Is that an accurate reflection of your experience, as the regulator, of how the call-in procedure under CAR operates?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

No. I will hand back to you, convener.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

So, as the regulator, you have no view on whether the call-in procedure operates well or whether what is set out in the document is correct. You have no idea, as the regulator.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Okay—right. I do not know whether that gives me much to go on. However, I will put on the record that I find it really surprising that, as the regulator, you cannot confirm whether the details that are set out in the document and the consultation are correct. I will let you take that away and you can reflect on it as a regulator, but I do not think that it reflects well on you.

My second issue is pre-application community engagement. You will be required to put in place a public participation statement, given the discretionary nature of what will operate with regard to some of the call-in procedures. How do you intend to develop the public participation statement, and what is the timeline for that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

So you do not have an opinion on whether the process operates well. Was that a serious answer?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Good morning. The 2016 act made provision for changes to the rent review process that were never fully implemented, largely because, from what we can see in evidence, the process was viewed as being unworkable. Will the changes to the rent review process being proposed in the bill be more workable than what was in place previously?