The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 763 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
So, if the detail that is set out in the land management plan is not an obligation, what is the purpose of it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
No, I do not think so. I am trying to understand why a landowner who has given a commitment in a land management plan should not be responsible for implementing the bits that they are responsible for, if there has not been a material change, such as a change in subsidy for farming.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
The Scottish Land Commission originally proposed that there should be an explicit public interest test in the bill. Would you prefer the approach of having that test as opposed to having the transfer test, as is currently in the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Great—thank you.
Do you agree with all those principles—transparency, awareness raising and engagement—being in a land management plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Is the timeline of around five years for the land management plan correct, or should the period of time be longer?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
That is helpful—thank you.
If obligations were set out in a land management plan over a longer period of time—let us say 10 years—should the new owner of the land carry forward those obligations if the land is sold within that period of time?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
I understand that, but, for those things that are not changed, do you think that they should be held responsible for implementing them, if they are responsible for doing so?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
I take a simple approach to things such as plans: somebody has to be responsible for their implementation. If parts of a plan are not implemented, who is responsible for that? Who is responsible for implementing the bits that are being taken forward? I am trying to understand your view. If a land management plan containing clear obligations is set out and the land manager consults on it, spends £15,000 on it and says that he will take it forward but does not bother doing so, who should be responsible for that?
10:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
I understand that material changes might come along that result in a need to have a variation to the plan, but, for areas where that does not happen, who should be responsible? Why should the landowner not be responsible for implementing the things that they set out in their plan?