The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1144 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
It certainly adds if you can see the workings. I must confess, I find that argument quite bizarre—nobody else does it, so we are not doing it. It is not a case of, “Well, we don’t do it”; it is a case of whether you should do it. That is the point, so I find that quite a bizarre approach.
Let me move on—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
I have to say that I do not think that many members of the public will read the draft climate change plan at all, never mind the actual data.
The cabinet secretary provided a good illustration when she mentioned health. A modelling process will have been used to arrive at the health statistics, as will disaggregated data, and that is the sort of data that is being asked for with regard to how you have arrived at some of the headline figures in the draft climate change plan. That is what we are looking for—the disaggregated data and the modelling used to give substance to those figures.
Another point that has been raised with the committee is the level of detail in the draft plan. Some of the sectoral emission levels have been set out in the plan on a policy basis, under headings such as “Business and Industrial Process”, and then there are other areas, such as buildings, where there is a higher level of reporting. What is the thinking behind having broader areas such as business and industry rather than areas that are more contained, such as buildings? How do you intend to create the right type of oversight on those different levels of policy?
10:15
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Okay. That makes sense. You will want to take specific aspects into account for stuff to do with housing within a Scottish dynamic.
That brings me to the question of oversight of the figures for the targets. Do you have a similar oversight mechanism to see what progress has been made in meeting the emissions reduction levels in the different sectors? You will be using a slightly different analytical approach to arrive at the figures for them. What is the oversight mechanism to ensure that those sectors are making progress? Is that different, given the different nature of the analytical process that you have used?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
It is the Government’s plan, so yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
That seems to be a pragmatic way of dealing with it for the small operators. What does the tapering timeline look like? So that I am clear, is the issue for the smaller operators that there is a lack of capacity in energy-from-waste facilities, or do they not have the contracts in place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Is the tapering dependent on those facilities being operational?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
My understanding is that they were looking for about £3.08 million over the next two financial years—£1.7 million this year and £1.3 million next year—which appears to be a very small part of the £436 million in your budget. From what we have been told, the consequence is that Wave Energy Scotland—which the Scottish Government set up in 2014—will be closed down and 10 full-time-equivalent jobs will be lost. Mocean Energy, a company based in Edinburgh, has said that it will have to close down, with 13 direct jobs being lost. What message does that cut send out about our ambition on marine energy in general, if we are quite literally pulling the plug on the key parts of trying to deliver wave energy?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Okay, so the 45 per cent reduction is all associated with projects coming to an end.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
Thanks. My final area of questions is the funding and resourcing of the energy consents unit. That remains in the energy transition budget line, but ministerial responsibilities will move to the Minister for Public Finance. I want to understand the rationale for that. Are you satisfied that the ECU has sufficient resource to meet the demand that it is facing? Alongside that, are you satisfied that the statutory consultees such as NatureScot have the necessary resources available to them to meet the increasing demand that they are facing and ensure the timely discharge of consent applications?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Michael Matheson
I think that I started that process, if I recall correctly.