The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1002 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
My issue is that we have received evidence suggesting that there should be an amendment to the bill so that it could be applied only to senior management.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That could be potentially one of the unintended consequences of having two areas of law that overlap one another on this matter.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay. I will bring in Murdo MacLeod.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Ricardo, can I clarify something? Are you suggesting that the regulatory authorities in England and Wales are issuing civil penalties for crimes that, based on the definition of ecocide in the bill, the bill would make a criminal offence in Scotland if it was enacted?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful, because there has been some suggestion of the bill being amended so that only senior managers in an organisation could be prosecuted. I am trying to understand the situation where an employee carries out an act that causes significant environmental harm but was outwith the company’s procedures and that they should not have done. How would you then prosecute a senior manager or director of an organisation who knew nothing about that and was not involved in it? If a person acted outwith the company’s procedures, you might then pursue a prosecution against a senior manager that could result in that person being imprisoned for up to 20 years. I do not understand how you would take that forward as a prosecutor or how our courts would look at it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
My point is not about the provisions that are in the bill; it is about the suggestion that those provisions should be removed in a way that would mean that the only individuals who could be prosecuted are senior managers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
What if that defence was removed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful. Thank you. Some EU countries have an administrative liability scheme as opposed to a criminal liability scheme when it comes to environmental crime, which is different from what we have in Scots law.
Deterrence is a key theme that has come through in the answers that we have had so far as to why we might wish to introduce a bill of this nature, with an ecocide offence. You will have heard the evidence that we received from the first panel. The head of environmental crime at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service of Scotland said that it has been unable to identify any such offences having been brought to it since 2014 and that it is struggling to anticipate something in the future that the existing law would not be capable of dealing with.
If we lack any identifiable evidence of cases over the past, let us say, 10-plus years, and if our prosecutors are saying that they cannot think of any offences that could occur in Scotland that the existing law could not deal with but that the bill seeks to deal with, where exactly is the deterrence in introducing a bill of this nature?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Matheson
Could I ask Rachel Killean about deterrence? Our prosecutors in the Crown Office say that they cannot identify any cases, and they cannot envisage any cases in the future, that they could not prosecute using existing legislation. Therefore, what is the deterrent effect of having a bill to criminalise ecocide?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Michael Matheson
I want to pick up on that theme and come back, in particular, to Ross Haggart’s comments about the provisions in section 40 of the 2014 act, the permit exemption aspect and the cause and effect of that type of change not being made to the bill. If that aspect is not introduced as part of the bill, might the precautionary principle be, in effect, ramped up to the extent that SEPA gets so risk averse that any developments seeking permits will actually find it quite difficult to get them? Might you, as a regulator, become increasingly anxious about the liability that you might face at some future point and about being pursued for committing ecocide or for contributing to it? Is that a risk?
10:15