The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 763 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
So, clearly, implementation is a key part of the effectiveness of any land management plan process, and of its credibility and whether there is value in it.
On that point, do you think that, if a piece of land changes hands after a land management plan has been put in place, the new owner should inherit the original plan’s intentions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Thanks. Magnus Linklater, do you want to comment on the issue of lotting?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
We touched on this issue to some degree in earlier answers, but I would like to dig a wee bit deeper. I would like to get your view on the provisions around lotting in the bill. Do you think that they are right and are workable, and what do you think their potential impact would be in helping to diversify land ownership in the future?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
My second question is whether any of you, from your different perspectives, can see merit in a transfer test as opposed to a public interest test.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
What sort of time frame would be more suitable?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
What about you, Peter Peacock?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
I take from that that you would favour longer-term land management plans. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Do you think that the conditions that are set out in an agreed land management plan should be inherited by any new owner of that land?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
I will turn briefly to the idea of the public interest test, which a number of you have mentioned, given that the bill proposes a transfer test. The original consultation proposed the idea of a public interest test, which the Scottish Land Commission recommended. Do you understand why the Scottish Government chose to introduce a transfer test, rather than a public interest test?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Good morning. I will stick with land management plans. Andy Wightman made reference to the fact that, often, a lot of key aspects of land management are in long-term plans. The period that is intended by the Government for a land management plan is five years. Is that too short? Should it be a longer period, which would make more sense in respect of the ability to implement the plan’s proposals?