The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 763 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
I want to clarify a point that you made earlier, Gary, about ministers looking at using lotting to put land into crofting tenure. If ministers had that power, should such lotting be restricted to land in the crofting counties, or should it apply to any parcel of land, even if it is outwith the crofting counties?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Thank you very much for your attendance. Your evidence has been a very helpful contribution to the committee’s evidence taking on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. It will help inform our thinking and our stage 1 report, which is due next year.
We now move into private session.
12:18 Meeting continued in private until 12:36.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Let me take you back to land management plans, which are one of the significant levers in the bill, as it stands. There is a provision in the bill that requires that land management plans be produced—there is an obligation on the landholder to do that. Failure to do so will, potentially, result in a fine. Do you think that the provisions go far enough?
I will expand on why I am asking you whether I think that they go far enough. There might be an obligation on landowners to produce a plan, but there is no obligation on them to do anything with that plan once it has been produced. Should the bill include an express provision that requires a landowner to make progress with their land management plan and any agreed actions that are set out in it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
If you feel that the process is a bit gumsy at the moment, what would a process that has teeth look like?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
As it stands, the bill has a prescribed list of those who can raise complaints. Is having a prescribed list the right approach, and does who is on that list need to be expanded? Do you have a view on who else should be on the list or is a prescribed list of that nature the wrong approach and anyone should be able to make a complaint if they wish to do so?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
It is like taking the fifth amendment. [Laughter.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
If the commission does not have a view, the federation must have a view, Donna Smith. [Laughter.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Our third item of business is an evidence session on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. Today, the committee will hear from a panel of crofting representatives. I am pleased to welcome Donna Smith, chief executive, Scottish Crofting Federation; and Andrew Thin, a commissioner, and Gary Campbell, chief executive officer, the Crofting Commission. Thank you for your attendance at committee this morning.
For this item, I am also pleased to welcome Rhoda Grant MSP, who will have an opportunity to pursue some questioning following committee members’ questions.
I will start with a broad question. We are at stage 1—looking at the general principles of the bill. You will be familiar with the policy memorandum associated with the bill and the Government’s objectives for the bill. Do the provisions in the bill, as they stand, go far enough to support what the Government is trying to achieve on greater diversity of land ownership?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
That is a good question, and we will save it for the minister when she appears.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
On that suggestion, do you have any practical examples of times in the past 10 to 20 years when such a provision could have been useful and would have allowed land to be used for crofting? Can you think of any examples off the top of your head? If you cannot, feel free to get back to us later.