The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 763 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Apologies for missing that you had put your hand up, Tara. Could you give us a bit more detail? What is the form of the intimidation that is experienced? How does it manifest itself?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Just so that I am clear, should the list of the organisations that can make the complaints be dealt with in secondary legislation so that it could be varied at some point in the future if there was a gap?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
We should also recognise that there might be a power imbalance in the relationship, and we should consider how that should be balanced to manage some of the associated risk when dealing with complaints or issues.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
For clarity, if I go to the land register for information about your non-discretionary fund landholdings, those will be registered to the owner of the piece of land that you are assisting them to manage. Will discretionary fund landholdings be registered to Gresham House?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful. Gresham House Forest Fund VI could have 10, 20 or 30 different investors with ownership of it. Is that correct?
11:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Just to understand what you said in response to Kevin Stewart, you as an organisation would have no problem with publishing the list of those who happen to be in Gresham House forest fund VI, so that we can see exactly who has invested in that piece of land.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
We can clarify that through other means.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
I am conscious of witnesses raising the concern about the potential for unintended consequences around some of the thresholds that have been set and how they might impact on land. Would it be more appropriate to deal with any threshold issues through regulation as opposed to the bill? From a parliamentary perspective, it would mean that you could change the threshold without the need to go back to primary legislation. If significant issues started to emerge, you could deal with them within months, through the introduction of regulations to the Parliament. Would that be a useful safeguard against any issues being brought about through unintended consequences?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Rob Carlow, do you think that the bill strikes the right balance between public and private interests on community right-to-buy provisions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Michael Matheson
The bill as it stands has a provision for pursuing a complaint about a breach of the community obligation provisions in land management plans, but it is a qualified provision. The Scottish Land Commission suggests in its recently published report that that qualification should be expanded to include in its scope a greater range of organisations that could make a complaint or allege breaches. Do you agree with the provisions in the bill as it stands, or do you think that the expansion of the range of organisations in line with what the Scottish Land Commission suggests is more appropriate?
I will start with David Fleetwood, given that your organisation is a significant landholder. What is your view on the scope of the existing qualification?