Skip to main content

Language: English / GĂ idhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 763 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Apologies for missing that you had put your hand up, Tara. Could you give us a bit more detail? What is the form of the intimidation that is experienced? How does it manifest itself?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Just so that I am clear, should the list of the organisations that can make the complaints be dealt with in secondary legislation so that it could be varied at some point in the future if there was a gap?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

We should also recognise that there might be a power imbalance in the relationship, and we should consider how that should be balanced to manage some of the associated risk when dealing with complaints or issues.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

For clarity, if I go to the land register for information about your non-discretionary fund landholdings, those will be registered to the owner of the piece of land that you are assisting them to manage. Will discretionary fund landholdings be registered to Gresham House?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

That is helpful. Gresham House Forest Fund VI could have 10, 20 or 30 different investors with ownership of it. Is that correct?

11:00  

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Just to understand what you said in response to Kevin Stewart, you as an organisation would have no problem with publishing the list of those who happen to be in Gresham House forest fund VI, so that we can see exactly who has invested in that piece of land.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

We can clarify that through other means.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

I am conscious of witnesses raising the concern about the potential for unintended consequences around some of the thresholds that have been set and how they might impact on land. Would it be more appropriate to deal with any threshold issues through regulation as opposed to the bill? From a parliamentary perspective, it would mean that you could change the threshold without the need to go back to primary legislation. If significant issues started to emerge, you could deal with them within months, through the introduction of regulations to the Parliament. Would that be a useful safeguard against any issues being brought about through unintended consequences?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

Rob Carlow, do you think that the bill strikes the right balance between public and private interests on community right-to-buy provisions?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Michael Matheson

The bill as it stands has a provision for pursuing a complaint about a breach of the community obligation provisions in land management plans, but it is a qualified provision. The Scottish Land Commission suggests in its recently published report that that qualification should be expanded to include in its scope a greater range of organisations that could make a complaint or allege breaches. Do you agree with the provisions in the bill as it stands, or do you think that the expansion of the range of organisations in line with what the Scottish Land Commission suggests is more appropriate?

I will start with David Fleetwood, given that your organisation is a significant landholder. What is your view on the scope of the existing qualification?