Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1171 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

So, an independent person would review the matter.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

There are only so many mitigation measures that can be put in place, so there will be only so much mitigation that can be done. Given the Scottish Government’s ambition to reach 40GW of offshore wind by 2040, where we are in the delivery pipeline in Scottish waters, as well as there obviously being a pipeline in England and Wales, what will be the process to ensure that it is not simply a case of first come, first served? If you drop all the scope mitigations that could be put in place outwith your own project, that could result in projects further down the line finding that there is not much left for them to do. It will not be quite like that—I am putting it in a fairly crude way—but I am trying to think about how we can ensure that we are giving as much scope as possible to maximise the process in a way that keeps in mind that it will be way into the 2030s before some projects are delivered and that there is a need to ensure that there are still some mitigation measures that they can help to support, when it comes to the point at which they need to do that.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

I am not asking for the exact threshold. I presume that the decision would be made on the balance of probabilities, rather than a requirement that the evidence was beyond reasonable doubt. I am trying to establish the evidential threshold.

It would be a civil matter, not a criminal matter and, therefore, I presume that the threshold would be the balance of probabilities. A criminal matter in the courts has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt but, obviously, a court of law will not be determining those matters.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

So, decisions would be made on the balance of probabilities

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

If there was that requirement, you would have to be calling witnesses, et cetera, so decisions will have to be made on the balance of probabilities. Surely, that is the settled position.

That means that, if someone commits an offence on a bus and they are subsequently convicted for it in a criminal court, they will lose their pass. It does not matter what the offence is. As soon as that person is convicted, they will have been convicted on a higher threshold than is required for the removal of their bus pass. It seems to me that, if someone commits a serious offence on a bus and they are convicted of it, they will lose their pass—without a doubt.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

I know of specific cases in which it is just that you did not have the internal capacity to deal with the application.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

I will stick with the subject of your role as a statutory consultee in the consenting and planning process, initially with regard to on-land projects and developments. In the course of the past year, have any projects that went to planning been delayed as a result of NatureScot not having the capacity to respond within the timescale for consideration of the planning application?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

It looks as though, on occasions, you do not meet the timeframe. You are not clear about exactly why that is the case, and you do not know the figure for the number of cases in the past year in which you have not been able to meet the timeframe as a statutory consultee for local planning matters. Pete Higgins, what sort of discussion takes place at the board in relation to the executive team’s oversight of these matters?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

NatureScot (Annual Report and Accounts and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Michael Matheson

We are in a situation where the chief executive does not know the figure for the past year but we do know that there are delays that have an impact on live planning applications, for which you are the statutory consultee, and, to date, the board has had no oversight of that. Is that correct?