The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2804 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I would like to get some clarity as to what, specifically, was spent on active travel last year. The draft budget indicated a sum of £159.8 million, I think. Is that a reduction from the previous year?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is there an increase in the active travel budget for the coming year, or not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I will go back to Alison Irvine’s earlier point. You spoke about the need to balance investment in bus, concessionary travel, investment in infrastructure and the passenger experience and reliability of services. I am just thinking about how the Government makes these choices. You could look at the policy of dualling the A96, and you could say that, if the Government switched its policy to dualling key sections of the A96, the saving that that would make over a number of years could be invested in capital infrastructure for bus for the whole of Scotland as well as for the A96 corridor. The Government has choices that it can make. I am trying to get a sense of where bus sits in that, and whether £60 million might be enough for this year. If we are looking at a transformation of bus services, surely we need substantially more than that if we are to get the most out of modal shift and investment in public transport and achieve the change that is needed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
The point that I was making was about key sections. The Government recently suggested that the policy would be to dual key sections, such as the Nairn bypass, but it would stop short of full dualling.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is there money in the budget for the purchase and upgrade of Ardrossan harbour?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Well, yes—it is about all aspects of the systems.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in how the decarbonisation that will occur as a result of the instrument will link into the climate change plan, which we have just been scrutinising. I do not think that the plan contains a particular figure for shipping, unless shipping is listed separately from maritime figures. There is no assumption in the CCP of carbon reduction.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
There are some chunky emissions figures that are associated with domestic shipping, as Sarah Boyack has already alluded to. It would be good to get a sense of the cross-Government programme of engagement that is taking place with the different sectors to consider options. For example, there is a pelagic fishing fleet that is based largely in Shetland, where quite large vessels—up to 4,000 tonnes—are doing what they do. It feels that there is low-hanging fruit that can be drawn into the climate change plan.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
It is my understanding that the European Union has a regulation on the minimum number of EV charging points at workplaces, but that the Scottish Government decided a number of years ago not to align itself with the EU on that—we have not adopted that minimum. Could the Government think again about creating a requirement for EV charging at workplaces, perhaps offering a better electricity price or even free charging?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Sarah Boyack talked about one side of the equation, which is about improving services, building capacity and putting in better quality infrastructure. However, the committee has heard a lot of evidence that that is not enough if we want to get modal shift. There needs to be some form of localised travel demand management alongside improvements in active travel, public transport and capacity. Does the Government support putting in local travel demand management, such as congestion charging and charging for workplace parking? Do you see that as essential if we are to meet climate targets?