All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2015 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
Well, maybe if there is more information—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
In the last cleaner air for Scotland strategy, which was published in 2021, there was a commitment to bring in that code of practice. Is that work now really quite behind schedule?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
Will the exemptions be considered on a case-by-case basis? Say there was a situation where there was an arable area on an island, and there were, therefore, concerns about cadmium uptake in crops, could SEPA still say, “Well, actually, that’s not an appropriate area to be spreading sewage sludge,” and therefore rule against it, or is it that, if you are on an island, it is fine to spread sewage sludge?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. That answers the question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would that require legal change through the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
Right. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
—until you get involved in the CAFS3 process and see what Government thinking is on those things?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
But this is about creating a level playing field with the brewing sector. Is that correct? The brewing sector is covered by the waste aspects, even though it is still using a natural feedstock.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
Something that is not included in the regulations is ammonia emissions. My understanding is that the large industrial point-source emissions of ammonia from pig and poultry units are covered by the PPC regulations. They are already covered as industrial units under EU law, and under our laws, too.
However, there is an issue with other, larger collective sources of ammonia, which are not covered by any kind of regulation at all. As I understand it, the Government has, with those sources, decided to go down the route of best practice and codes of conduct with the industry. Having made that decision last year, can you tell us what progress is being made on tackling that greater source of ammonia emissions, which is causing air quality problems, particularly in rural areas?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Mark Ruskell
If, in the future, the EU decided to change that threshold and bring more intensive livestock units under regulation, and the Government decided that there was a strong evidential basis for such a move to do with air quality and everything else, what would be your next steps? At the moment, it seems that the focus is on a firm voluntary approach with a code of practice. If the EU were to move towards widening the scope of regulations, would the Government engage early on with the agriculture industry on what the best-available technologies would be? They might even include anaerobic digestion, so the industry might need more time to think about how it would implement them. Does the Government have a commitment to move forward in that respect?