The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3337 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I know that my colleagues want to come in on other aspects of the land management plan, so I will pass back to the convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
It comes back to my earlier point about what it looks like from the perspective of communities. If you turn up to a village hall, you want to see where the future housing sites are, but you also want to know what is happening with the land that surrounds the community and where those options are.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
There needs to be a joined-up picture that people can input into, rather than many complicated consultations that do not mean anything to anybody.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I turn to the transfer test. I am struggling to understand why the original proposals from the Scottish Land Commission for a public interest test were rejected. Instead, we have a transfer test, which is, in effect, backward looking. It is applied to the seller of the land rather than to the purchaser of the land. I am interested in why that judgment was made and why the Land Commission’s proposal on a public interest test was discounted.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am inviting you to do that—I will not mention the seals.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Indeed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
The matter came up in the evidence on the bill.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am just closing.
I hope that GB Energy will build on the success that we have had in Scotland and grow the economy in the right way to create the green jobs that are needed to meet our energy needs going forward. For those reasons, on balance, we will support the LCM at decision time.
17:23Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Scottish Greens will back the legislative consent motion at decision time, but I want to sound a note of caution, because we have come through a period in which devolution in Scotland and Wales faced unprecedented attacks from the previous Westminster Government. Intergovernmental ways of working in the UK are still largely based on precedent and good will, rather than being codified in legislation as they are in most other countries that have a devolved context. Ways of working that are based on principles of respect, such as the Sewel convention, have been seriously undermined and contested in recent years to a point where they have become almost meaningless.
In the context of the Great British Energy Bill, I welcome the changes that the Scottish Government has secured to embed a more consultative approach between the Administrations, but there is still a danger of overreach from a future Westminster Government. There will be a role for this Parliament to bring transparency to those relationships, and the convener of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee made some important points about the role of the committees in that.
When we reflect on the evidence that the committee received, there is clearly a sense that the Labour Government is working more collaboratively with Scottish ministers, which is very welcome. However, despite all the bluster from Anas Sarwar at First Minister’s question time today, when I asked Michael Shanks at committee about the role of GB Energy in promoting nuclear projects, he sounded pretty reasonable. He said:
“Clearly, we have a political difference on nuclear”.
He went on:
“there are no plans and there will be no engagement on that issue, because it is clear that the Scottish Government would block those applications.
That is the legitimate position that the Scottish Government has taken on that planning matter, and I do not think that there is a confrontation or a conflict on that.”—[Official Report, Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee, 21 January 2025; c 53.]
That was real clarity—no new nuclear in Scotland. That is what Labour head office says, and that is probably the best news that Labour back benchers have had all week.
However, Stephen Kerr raised a valid question, because it is still not really clear what GB Energy will do in Scotland, how many jobs it will create and how long it will take to do that. I take on board Sarah Boyack’s point that it is early days, but I note for clarity that there is a huge record of success in the development of renewable energy in Scotland, which is bringing down bills and keeping the lights on across the UK. For example, the onshore wind sector deal, which the Greens were proud to work on with SNP ministers during our time in government, is now starting to help to double the generation capacity from onshore wind in Scotland by 2030. With that will come opportunities for community benefit and community ownership, and that is real energy security.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Will the minister give way?