Seòmar agus comataidhean

Okay. Sarah Madden—do you want to come in?

David, do you have any brief comments?

I have more detailed questions on land management plans that follow the evidence that we have had so far. However, your initial comments are very useful in setting the context.

The committee heard from the Scottish Land Commission that there is a need to include local place plans in land management plans, which means incorporating the built environment planning element into LMPs. Do you have a view on that?

Sandra Holmes, I will come back to you about specific recommendations that the Land Commission has made in relation to LMPs. One recommendation is that they need to refer to local place plans—where those exist, because not all communities have the capacity, the interest or maybe even the population to develop them.

Finlay, do you have any reflections on this issue?

I was going to ask questions about lotting, and we have explored certain aspects of that, but I have a residual question in mind. We are dealing with hypotheticals here, because it is ultimately a ministerial decision, and ministers will look at viability and decide whether it makes sense to lot. It has been put to us in evidence that an outcome of lotting could be that Gresham House or another organisation might see lotted areas of land and say, “This is great—we will just buy these up for our shareholder,” and then, in effect, re-amalgamate land into a single consolidated holding for all intents and purposes. Is that a concern from the other side? Where there is a genuine case for lotting that is in the public interest—perhaps not in commercial forestry but in another setting—do you see the potential for organisations such as yours to, in effect, buy up and re-amalgamate forestry?

Do you see the interests of your clients, in particular those in commercial forestry, as being a version of the public interest? Do they clearly lie within the public interest?

You would see the activities that are invested in commercial forestry as being clearly within the public interest. Is that right?

It looks like Finlay Clark does not have any final reflections on that point, so I hand back to you, convener.

Good morning, everybody. One of the key provisions in the bill is around land management planning. It is fair to say that, although we have seen good community consultation between landowners and communities across Scotland in the past, we have also seen some bad consultation. From your perspectives, where do you think there has been, and what do you think constitutes, good practice in relation to involving and consulting communities on land management? I am not picking on you, David, but given that the John Muir Trust is a landowner, do you want to start?