The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3283 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
Scottish Green MSPs believe that everyone in Scotland deserves to benefit from affordable, accessible and reliable transport, including from their local bus services. Having access to better buses has hugely positive impacts on people’s lives, helping everyone to access education and work opportunities, to be connected to vital local and national services and to connect with one another. It also plays a role in addressing the climate crisis, because it encourages us all to leave the car at home and cut climate pollution.
However, people across Scotland still struggle with the affordability and accessibility of public transport, especially buses. Over the past decade, the cost of bus travel has risen by more than 60 per cent, which is faster than the rate of wages and the cost of living. Those fare increases put significant financial strain on families across Scotland and disproportionately impact people on low incomes, women and people from minority ethnic communities, as they are more likely to rely on the bus.
However, it does not have to be that way. The Scottish Greens have continuously fought to make public transport more affordable, accessible and reliable, which has included delivering free bus travel for all under-22s in Scotland from January 2022 and working constructively with the Government on successive budget deals. Three years on, we can see just how successful that scheme has been: since its roll-out, more than 250 million journeys have been made and there were over 800,000 cardholders as of June. I live with two of them at home. In my region, the scheme has been taken up by just over 100,000 young people, which has resulted in some 26.5 million journeys.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
To what extent does case law help us to make a distinction between “significant environmental harm” and “severe environmental harm”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
I guess that it would depend on whether the harm was severe or significant, in which case the higher sentencing would be available.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
How can criminal liability be established within large corporate entities and multinational organisations?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am particularly interested in the threshold of intent and recklessness.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to the threshold for liability. The bill requires intent or recklessness, but could it extend to negligence or provide for strict liability for organisations? That would be moving more into the territory of section 40 of the 2014 act, rather than staying purely with intent or recklessness. As Iain Batho said, that involves a much higher bar for proof, and there would then be a choice about which provisions to go for.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
And short questions—okay. The panel has already touched briefly on some of the definitions of ecocide, such as severe environmental harm and harm that is widespread and long term. Can you offer some comparison with how other jurisdictions have defined ecocide and say where you see the definition that sits in Monica Lennon’s bill? Ricardo, you covered this briefly earlier. Do you want to say anything more about how those terms are defined in the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
Can I get other views on the threshold for liability in the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
It has been a very interesting evidence session. I have a couple of questions for you and your team. First, you alluded to a letter that was sent to you from the Dogs Trust, Blue Cross, the SSPCA and the Scottish Greyhound Sanctuary. In that letter, they make a commitment to rehome any dogs as a consequence of the bill. It mentions that between 40 and 60 dogs may require to be rehomed. Does that give you confidence that the bill, should it go to a stage 3 vote and be passed, could be implemented sooner rather than later, and certainly within the 12-month implementation date in the bill?