Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 9 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2629 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Environmental Standards Scotland (Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24 and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

—until you get involved in the CAFS3 process and see what Government thinking is on those things?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

But this is about creating a level playing field with the brewing sector. Is that correct? The brewing sector is covered by the waste aspects, even though it is still using a natural feedstock.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

Something that is not included in the regulations is ammonia emissions. My understanding is that the large industrial point-source emissions of ammonia from pig and poultry units are covered by the PPC regulations. They are already covered as industrial units under EU law, and under our laws, too.

However, there is an issue with other, larger collective sources of ammonia, which are not covered by any kind of regulation at all. As I understand it, the Government has, with those sources, decided to go down the route of best practice and codes of conduct with the industry. Having made that decision last year, can you tell us what progress is being made on tackling that greater source of ammonia emissions, which is causing air quality problems, particularly in rural areas?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

If, in the future, the EU decided to change that threshold and bring more intensive livestock units under regulation, and the Government decided that there was a strong evidential basis for such a move to do with air quality and everything else, what would be your next steps? At the moment, it seems that the focus is on a firm voluntary approach with a code of practice. If the EU were to move towards widening the scope of regulations, would the Government engage early on with the agriculture industry on what the best-available technologies would be? They might even include anaerobic digestion, so the industry might need more time to think about how it would implement them. Does the Government have a commitment to move forward in that respect?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

If the code of practice does not work and does not bring down ammonia emissions, will you regulate?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

Okay.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

Cabinet secretary, I want to ask you specifically about the change in the cadmium threshold in relation to sewage sludge. I believe that that has changed since the regulations were originally introduced in November. I want to understand what the change means in practice with regard to islands, grasslands and other areas where there are exemptions for higher cadmium thresholds. Can you explain that, please?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

I am struggling to understand the difference between waste and non-waste AD. I used to live next to a whisky distillery, and what came out of its back end was definitely waste, to all intents and purposes. Why is there a distinction between waste and non-waste? Is it not the case that those who do anaerobic digestion with waste already have the technology that those doing non-waste anaerobic digestion could just pick up and implement?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Environmental Standards Scotland (Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24 and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

Sure—that is fine.

I want to reflect on the evidence that we had from SEPA when it came to the committee last month. We discussed the central overarching target of ensuring that about four fifths of our water bodies in Scotland, which include rivers and coastal lochs, are in good or better condition by 2027. SEPA identified that the biggest issue there is more to do with diffuse pollution, which comes from agriculture and other sources more generally, rather than from CSOs specifically.

I ask you for your reflection on that. It feels like it is a big issue if we miss that target. What more can ESS do? Do you share SEPA’s concerns? Where should the pressure on Government, or on other bodies, be?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Environmental Standards Scotland (Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24 and Future Priorities)

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

What kind of output will we see from ESS on that? Arguably, this area is harder to tackle. It should be relatively easy where Scottish Water has consent for discharge of CSOs—that is permitted and there is a set of rules, and if you break those rules, you are out of compliance. Diffuse pollution is harder—it is about farmers and landowners, and regulation, good practice or whatever. It feels like a trickier issue to deal with.