The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2629 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Mark Ruskell
You quoted from a list, I think.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Mark Ruskell
I have two quick questions. One is about the former Prime Minister’s announcement on the phase-out of fossil fuel-powered cars and whether that has had any bearing on UK policy. Is UK policy pretty much predictable, with no changes in the measures that we are talking about today, or has the then PM’s announcement introduced some uncertainty in that regard?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 3 October 2024
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the recommendations in the recent Oxfam Scotland report, “Cleared for Take-off: A Private Jet Tax for Scotland”. (S6O-03811)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 3 October 2024
Mark Ruskell
I thank the cabinet secretary for that constructive answer.
Oxfam has calculated that introducing a tax on private jets in Scotland could raise nearly £22 million a year, which would be enough to deliver the fairer fares on trains that commuters really need. Last week at First Minister’s question time, we heard that the First Minister would be
“very much in the spirit of”—[Official Report, 26 September 2024; c 17.]
embedding such a tax on luxury travel in a future air departure tax.
Would the minister support such an initiative? Can he provide more detail on the discussions that his Government is undertaking with the UK Government on the introduction of an air departure tax for Scotland and, in particular, on the intricacies around the details of an exemption for the Highlands and Islands? How much progress can we see being made on that in the months ahead?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Mark Ruskell
I join members in thanking David Torrance for lodging the motion on 125 years of Fife College. His motion rightly celebrates the origins of the college, its long history and the huge positive benefit that it has had on generations of Fifers and their communities.
It was lovely for us to meet the students in the members’ restaurant earlier; there was a huge amount of enthusiasm, and I think that we will see some real stars of the hospitality sector emerge from that group of young people. I am hugely optimistic, and I am looking forward to my dinner later on.
I will share a few thoughts on the future of the college and the critical role that it is playing in this century in the fight against climate change. It is the colleges, as much as—if not more than—the universities, that will be needed on the front line of that fight. Building the workforce of the future with practical skills for the delivery of net zero infrastructure will be critical. Supply chains will need to be transformed in the next five years to decarbonise our homes, service wind farms, restore peatland and plant woodland. Even industrial big hitters such as the Mossmorran plant in Fife will need to transition to a cleaner, greener future.
I welcome the fact that Fife College has already been part of the skills conversation at Mossmorran, and has a range of courses that are supporting the transition of our entire economy. The growth of well-paid, skilled jobs in the green economy needs to offer a bright future for young people at the start of their careers, as well as a future for those who are looking to transition into new green jobs. That is another reason why the Scottish Green Party wants restoration of the £26 million that was allocated in last year’s budget for transformation in our college sector.
We cannot hold back when there are sectors of our economy that are unable to scale up to meet the challenge of climate change and the opportunities that we are presented with. Claire Baker talked about wind. In 2016, I visited Fife College in Rosyth and met a number of students who were on the wind turbine technician course. It was exciting to see the pride that they had in growing their skills and to hear about their expectations around apprenticeships and the work that they would be doing on the next generation of wind farms. As Claire Baker outlined, it is great to see that more of those apprenticeships are now starting to be taken up. I hope that the number of those apprenticeships dramatically increases in the years ahead, because the doubling of onshore wind farm capacity between now and 2030, and the revolution that is gathering pace in offshore wind in particular, point to a really bright future. Of course, we know that there are investment opportunities in Fife, particularly in Burntisland at the moment, in relation to offshore wind.
Alongside that, I also recognise the work that is happening at Fife College’s Leven campus to develop skills in green hydrogen. To be fair, from my perspective, the jury remains out on whether hydrogen will ever be a cost-effective way to heat the majority of our homes. However, it is an area of innovation, and decarbonising heating remains a huge opportunity in the next decade. I hope that the college can also realise the far bigger opportunities surrounding the installation and servicing of heat pumps, as well as district heating, which together have the potential to power around a quarter of Scotland’s homes. There are great jobs and great potential in that area, and I hope that the college remains at the heart of that.
Of course, climate change is about more than specialist professions. It affects us all, so I was pleased to see the focus that the college has brought to the issue. The Adam Smith scholarships that were awarded to three students for their writing and art that reflected on what climate change means for them in their personal life and studies was a small but important example of climate leadership.
Fife College’s climate change strategy and action plan should also be commended. The cut in emissions by more than a half since 2014 is great progress, and plans to further strip out fossil fuel use from its operations are key, including those for Scotland’s first net zero campus in Dunfermline, which is a huge milestone for the college and for Fife.
I thank David Torrance again for bringing the debate to the chamber. I enjoyed hearing about his experience of going to college—I certainly cherished the time that I spent at Stevenson College many years ago. I thank the college staff, who do amazing work to inspire our young people and people returning to education. Let us look forward to the next 125 years—they are going to be momentous.
17:42Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Mark Ruskell
The Just Transition Commission’s report advised that the process of developing just transition plans for other industrial sites that are linked to Grangemouth, such as Mossmorran, should begin urgently. I will be hosting a worker-led summit with unions, operators and decision makers in December to start a meaningful conversation on the development of a worker-led just transition plan for Mossmorran. I invite the minister and the cabinet secretary to join me and all those stakeholders in a vital conversation at the summit later this year.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Mark Ruskell
I think that all the witnesses are making the point that, in some form or other, alignment between UK plans and devolved Administration plans is important. I am thinking about whether there are other ways to cut that.
Under the bill, the plan and the budgets are set at the beginning of a parliamentary session. Obviously, the Westminster Government is on a different timescale, but could there be a point where there is an update or a report in Scotland following the publication of a UK budget or plan? I am thinking about ways in which you could align the dates—you could align them entirely or information from a UK plan could be fed into devolved plans. I do not know. On a practical level, how do you get that kind of alignment? Is it a straight choice about whether to align the dates or not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Mark Ruskell
No. Are there any other comments?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Mark Ruskell
From the climate science perspective?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Mark Ruskell
To wrap up the conversation, it seems that you are talking about a dynamic reporting situation. Climate science might change within a five-year period; the financial situation for UK devolved Administrations might change dramatically; we might make less progress on our plans than we thought would be possible; and there might also be a UK plan that increases, or does not increase, our ambition.
You already brought up all those circumstances in your evidence. Would they trigger an update report, a rethink or a section 36 report? Do we need some dynamism in reporting and in the updates to plans?