The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2887 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Thanks.
I have one last question. I am aware that, at long last, a scheme has been put in place to extend concessionary bus travel to people trapped in the asylum system, who have no recourse to public funds and are effectively destitute. However, I believe that the current budget for the scheme will end on 31 March. Will the Government extend that provision into next year?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Well, £4 million seems like quite a low amount.
I want to talk about the overall spend, though. We are looking at £472.8 million—half of the Scottish bus industry’s income. The industry says that the scheme is neither a benefit nor a disbenefit to it, but, when we see those figures, it is hard to see how it is not a massive benefit to the industry when substantial numbers of people travel by bus who would not do so were it not for the Government’s investment in the schemes, which is very welcome.
How do we get more out of this? What about the conditionality for the bus companies? What about the linkage with investment in better bus services at either a community level or a regional level? What about the Government’s target for a vehicle mileage reduction? Are we getting the most out of the investment? Could we be hitting other public transport policy objectives by using the existence of the cards and the massive investment as a lever to get more bang for our buck?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
What does Transport Scotland think about it? Does it have any creative ideas as to how we could use that huge investment to get more people out of their cars? What is the offer for people out there? Are we linking this with travel planning for colleges, universities and workplaces? I do not know. As a transport policy, this has been fantastic, and it is a great initiative that supports individuals. However, when it comes to all the wider transport issues that we are really struggling with at the moment, how do we use this to drive modal shift? That is the key question. What do your officials have to say about that?
11:00
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Are you saying that, if we give it another couple of years, it will be fixed? Is the HSE telling you, “It’s fine; we’ve got it under control”? The industry does not know what it is meant to be collecting right now.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Okay, but the committee cannot see it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am finished, convener. I will let other members come in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I think that this is a mess. The UK REACH process was set up in 2018, and I do not think that it has ever worked. I appreciate the comments that the cabinet secretary has made. This is a situation that Scotland does not want to find itself in with Brexit.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
No, that is fine. I have problems with both of them, but I will start with that one. I have concerns in relation to the role of the HSE. It is acting as both a regulator and a policy maker, which feels a bit like a power grab.
There is certainly a lack of transparency. We do not even have a consultation document for the regulations. I am concerned that decisions are being made without transparency. I do not know what is meant by alignment with the wider UN rules. I do not know whether we are going to end up aligning with the regulatory regimes of other nations, rather than with those of the EU. There are particular concerns about certain classes of hazards, such as children’s toys and endocrine disruptors. There might be other cases where we are effectively falling out of alignment with the EU, which would have serious implications. It would also have implications for trade.
I am concerned. I do not think that we have been presented with the full picture, and the HSE should, at the very least, be in front of the committee to answer questions before we agree to such a far-reaching set of chemicals regulations that could take us further out of alignment with the EU.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am not going to be content with what is before us.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am objecting in principle to what is before the committee this morning.