The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2629 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
We will come back to land management plans later, because a number of committee members, including me, are interested in them.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
Does that come back to what David Tydeman told the committee about the need for a plating line and a grand block? Will the £14 million investment gear you up to take on more subcontracting work?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland’s latest report on road policing. (S6O-04004)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
It is quite clear that speed kills, and that communities across Scotland are fed up with dangerous speeding that goes undetected, unenforced and unpunished by the police and the courts. That is a rural problem but it is also an urban problem. Does the cabinet secretary believe that it is time to devolve responsibility for speed enforcement to councils, allowing communities to control dangerous speeding and creating a much-needed source of revenue to invest in safer streets?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
Thanks for that. Did you want to comment, David?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to the issue of community consultation on land management. When I was looking at the evidence, I saw NFUS’s comment about
“informal practices that have taken place for generations”
in rural communities. I feel that that sort of thing is probably a bit patchy, having lived in rural areas most of my life. It is probably the case that some good and some not-so-good things happen. To what extent do you believe that voluntary engagement with communities is strong enough to effectively obviate the need for a statutory requirement in the bill? I am interested in your thoughts on that. The convener has already alluded to our visit to highland Perthshire, where we saw some pretty good practice, but we have also heard about some less-than-good practice, some very disengaged landowners and frustrated communities.
Shall we go back round again, kicking off with Sarah-Jane Laing?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
If land ownership in Scotland is more concentrated, an intervention will impact a much smaller number of people than, say, an intervention in Denmark, which would impact a much greater number of people. If a small number of people would be affected, what weighting is that given when considering the impact on the private property interest?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
That would be useful. David, do you have anything to add?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
The committee deals with climate change, among other issues, and we know that land use and management is now the biggest cause of emissions. Do you think that the biggest holdings, or those that generate the most emissions, should be obliged to adapt and to mitigate climate change? Should there also be reporting of that? Do you accept that, or do you contest it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Mark Ruskell
I think that, if you take out carbon sinks—wetlands and woodlands, which we are not planning to change—the land use sector, as a direct emitting sector, is now the highest emitter. That needs to be addressed.