The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3422 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
It surprises me that some of your larger corporate members would not be concerned about the bill. Am I right that smaller members think that an ecocide event might be possible under their control?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, they would be better equipped to deal with it.
Simon Parsons, from the perspective of a state utility, what would change if the bill passed into law?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Catherine McWilliam, do you have anything to add on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Back to you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Just before I leave you, Shivali, I think that you mentioned strict liability and particular sectors for which strict liability might be established as another form of backstop. I am thinking, for example, of genetically modified crops being released into the environment, or a GM fish that could decimate wild salmon populations. Could an ecocide law focus more on that area of strict liability being established in certain situations, or should that really be the subject of a separate conversation about environmental damage and how responsible certain sectors need to be?
09:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks. Can we move to other speakers online?
Great, we have the screen back. We will go to Sue Miller.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Right, okay. Sue?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Shivali?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Jonnie Hall spoke about making a distinction between a catastrophic event, such as a point-source pollution, and longer-term practices that might degrade the environment over time and which we might not know about until it is too late.
Can you point to particular risks around ecocide in each of your sectors? Are you saying that you do not see ecocide applying at all to your sectors and that you are more concerned about a wider definition that could capture long-term management of farms, the seas and Scottish Water assets over time? Are there other examples in farming—say, a pollution incident in which hundreds of tonnes of slurry goes into a river and kills it off—that you could clearly call ecocide?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Earlier, if I picked it up correctly, Elspeth MacDonald said that there are some concerns within the sector about the lack of investment in enforcement. Is your point that there could be situations in which fishers go into an area where a species gets fished out, which could constitute ecocide, but, because there is a lack of enforcement, licensing and enforcement of the licence should have kicked in earlier and people are therefore left in a difficult situation? I am just trying to imagine it from the fishers’ point of view. What is your concern? What changes as a result of the bill? Are you reliant upon the state effectively requiring you to stick with and enforce the licences, or does the bill bring in a new set of responsibilities for you? How do fishers address that challenge?
11:30