The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2921 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you for that. I want to move on to talk about the changes that have taken place, particularly the four whole-time equivalent posts that have been removed from the staffing baseline. I want to better understand how that is being absorbed across the organisation.
My understanding is that those posts relate to professional trainees. Will you say a bit more about that? Moreover, given the pressures on the organisation and on your objectives—for example, you have talked about getting back on track to reach target levels—how does the decision to remove those posts link to that?
10:30Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
The message that I am getting is that that broad pipeline of apprenticeships and graduate and professional trainee posts is consistent, with some variation from year to year as a result of changes within the organisation, promotions and everything else.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Could that be unsettling? If colleagues see that a post is not being filled, does that not automatically create a pressure?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you very much.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, I have a question. We had a good answer from Waqas Sanawar earlier about the reductions in property costs, but I wanted to ask about the £50,000 property cost saving in relation to the Edinburgh office. What is the background to that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I know that this might be a sensitive area, given history, but have there been any interministerial discussions about securing an exemption to the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020? That has been done successfully before, particularly with single-use vapes, and the provision under section 140 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 is available, if everybody is happy with that. Obviously, getting everybody happy in the UK is the challenge.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Will the cabinet secretary give way?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am trying to understand that argument. You are, in effect, saying that we should have a national marine plan with no reference to fisheries in it. I do not quite understand that. Surely fisheries management is, by its very nature, spatial, and therefore a spatial interpretation of fisheries management and a relationship to a plan alongside other activities, including activities that use the seabed, such as renewables and fish farming, would be quite a rational approach. I appreciate the distinction between onshore and offshore, but surely a marine plan needs to include marine activities, among which fisheries are an important spatial form of management.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
In the words of Douglas Lumsden, it has been a monster mega stage 2—[Laughter.]—so I will keep my comments short.
I am seeking to amend the title of the bill to reflect the urgency of the nature crisis and the collective will of the Parliament to act to address it. Amendment 33 would rename the bill to the “Nature Emergency (Scotland) Bill”. I draw the committee’s attention to the fact that the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee scrutinised the Scottish biodiversity strategy and made the recommendation to the Government—I do not know whether the recommendation was picked up—that the strategy should be renamed “Scotland’s Nature Emergency Strategy” to underline the seriousness of the issue, and the intent for what the strategy should be achieving and the action that it should be driving.
The vision and purpose of the bill is important. As we have explored in earlier debates about part 2, the focus must be on moving forward on restoring nature. We are in a nature emergency, and we should reflect that in the title of the bill.
I move amendment 33.